From: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"David Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Nirmal Patel" <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
"Jonathan Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jian-Hong Pan" <jhp@endlessos.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1.2 parameters when enable link state
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:02:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424110223.21799-2-jhp@endlessos.org> (raw)
Currently, when enable link's L1.2 features with __pci_enable_link_state(),
it configs the link directly without ensuring related L1.2 parameters, such
as T_POWER_ON, Common_Mode_Restore_Time, and LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD have been
programmed.
This leads the link's L1.2 between PCIe Root Port and child device gets
wrong configs when a caller tries to enabled it.
Here is a failed example on ASUS B1400CEAE with enabled VMD:
10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
...
Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates
L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us PortTPowerOnTime=50us
L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
T_CommonMode=45us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns
L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us
10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
...
Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- L1_PM_Substates+
PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us
L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
According to "PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4", before enabling ASPM L1.2 on the PCIe
Root Port and the child NVMe, they should be programmed with the same
LTR1.2_Threshold value. However, they have different values in this case.
Invoke aspm_calc_l12_info() to program the L1.2 parameters properly before
enable L1.2 bits of L1 PM Substates Control Register in
__pci_enable_link_state().
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218394
Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
---
v2:
- Prepare the PCIe LTR parameters before enable L1 Substates
v3:
- Only enable supported features for the L1 Substates part
v4:
- Focus on fixing L1.2 parameters, instead of re-initializing whole L1SS
v5:
- Fix typo and commit message
- Split introducing aspm_get_l1ss_cap() to "PCI/ASPM: Introduce
aspm_get_l1ss_cap()"
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index c55ac11faa73..553327dee991 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -1402,6 +1402,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state);
static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked)
{
struct pcie_link_state *link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);
+ struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
+ u32 parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap;
if (!link)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1433,6 +1435,16 @@ static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked)
link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM | ASPM_STATE_L1;
if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM)
link->aspm_default |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM | ASPM_STATE_L1;
+ /*
+ * Ensure L1.2 parameters: Common_Mode_Restore_Times, T_POWER_ON and
+ * LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD are programmed properly before enable bits for
+ * L1.2, per PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4.
+ */
+ if (state & link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK) {
+ parent_l1ss_cap = aspm_get_l1ss_cap(parent);
+ child_l1ss_cap = aspm_get_l1ss_cap(child);
+ aspm_calc_l12_info(link, parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
+ }
pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));
link->clkpm_default = (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM) ? 1 : 0;
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 11:02 Jian-Hong Pan [this message]
2024-04-27 0:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1.2 parameters when enable link state David E. Box
2024-04-30 7:46 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-04-30 18:26 ` David E. Box
2024-05-03 9:45 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-05-03 19:15 ` David E. Box
2024-05-03 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-05-13 10:40 ` Jian-Hong Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424110223.21799-2-jhp@endlessos.org \
--to=jhp@endlessos.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).