From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:18:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424181857.00000e0f@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cfc4e2d-65ab-0040-2c7d-fad83f32455b@huawei.com>
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:53:34 +0800
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> wrote:
> > @@ -232,6 +263,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> > static int cpu0_initialized;
> > unsigned long long value;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > acpi_processor_errata();
> >
> > @@ -316,10 +348,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
> > */
> > if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
> > - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
> > + ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
> >
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto err;
> > + } else {
> > + acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -357,6 +391,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > arch_fix_phys_package_id(pr->id, value);
> >
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +err:
> > + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
>
> ...
>
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -365,8 +403,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc.
> > * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe().
> > */
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
> > -
> > static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > const struct acpi_device_id *id)
> > {
> > @@ -395,28 +431,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
> > return 0;
> >
> > - BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Buggy BIOS check.
> > - * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
> > - * Don't trust it blindly
> > - */
> > - if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
> > - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
> > - dev_warn(&device->dev,
> > - "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
> > - pr->id);
> > - /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > - /*
> > - * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
> > - * checks.
> > - */
> > - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
> > - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
>
> Nit: seems we need to remove the duplicated
> per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; in acpi_processor_add():
>
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -446,7 +446,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device
> *device,
> err:
> free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map);
> device->driver_data = NULL;
> - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
I don't follow. This path is used if processor_get_info() succeeded and
we later fail. I don't see where the the duplication is?
> err_free_pr:
> kfree(pr);
> return result;
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 13:53 [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:53 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 18:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 6:18 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-26 9:23 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-18 13:53 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23 6:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-26 9:20 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-18 13:53 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] ACPI: processor: Drop duplicated check on _STA (enabled + present) Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 18:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 6:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-23 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 11:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-26 9:24 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-24 16:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23 11:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-24 17:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-25 1:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] ACPI: processor: Add acpi_get_processor_handle() helper Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 18:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-26 9:15 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 11:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-26 9:18 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for acpi_scan_check_and_detach() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 12:02 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-26 9:25 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 19:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 12:06 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-26 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 10:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23 12:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 10:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23 12:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-24 12:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-24 15:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-24 16:35 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-24 17:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 10:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 12:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 15:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 16:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-26 12:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-25 9:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 9:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 10:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 10:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-26 9:36 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-26 9:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to check if an ACPI handle is now available Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] arm64: Kconfig: Enable hotplug CPU on arm64 if ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-24 17:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-18 19:50 ` [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-22 19:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-19 15:39 ` Miguel Luis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424181857.00000e0f@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).