Linux-PM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: "rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Petkov, Borislav" <Borislav.Petkov@amd.com>,
	"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@amd.com>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@amd.com>,
	"oleksandr@natalenko.name" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
	"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>,
	"Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@amd.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/8] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:32:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21068e37-38fb-478c-8ec1-e41b0cd450e2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CYYPR12MB865528B3088DE9B43559000D9C1A2@CYYPR12MB8655.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On 4/30/2024 02:55, Yuan, Perry wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 1:05 AM
>> To: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>; rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com;
>> Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>; viresh.kumar@linaro.org;
>> Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>; Petkov, Borislav
>> <Borislav.Petkov@amd.com>; Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@amd.com>; Deucher,
>> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Huang, Shimmer
>> <Shimmer.Huang@amd.com>; oleksandr@natalenko.name; Du, Xiaojian
>> <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>; Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@amd.com>; linux-
>> pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/8] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:56 AM Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2024 1:38 AM
>>>> To: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
>>>> Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com; Limonciello, Mario
>>>> <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>; viresh.kumar@linaro.org; Shenoy,
>>>> Gautham Ranjal <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>; Petkov, Borislav
>>>> <Borislav.Petkov@amd.com>; Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@amd.com>;
>> Deucher,
>>>> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Huang, Shimmer
>>>> <Shimmer.Huang@amd.com>; oleksandr@natalenko.name; Du, Xiaojian
>>>> <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>; Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@amd.com>;
>> linux-
>>>> pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/8] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:08 AM Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch series adds some fixes and enhancements to the AMD
>>>>> pstate driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> It enables CPPC v2 for certain processors in the family 17H, as
>>>>> requested by TR40 processor users who expect improved performance
>>>>> and lower system temperature.
>>>>>
>>>>> changes latency and delay values to be read from platform firmware
>>>>> firstly for more accurate timing.
>>>>>
>>>>> A new quirk is introduced for supporting amd-pstate on legacy
>>>>> processors which either lack CPPC capability, or only only have
>>>>> CPPC
>>>>> v2 capability
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing done with one APU system while cpb boost on:
>>>>>
>>>>> amd_pstate_lowest_nonlinear_freq:1701000
>>>>> amd_pstate_max_freq:3501000
>>>>> cpuinfo_max_freq:3501000
>>>>> cpuinfo_min_freq:400000
>>>>> scaling_cur_freq:3084836
>>>>> scaling_max_freq:3501000
>>>>> scaling_min_freq:400000
>>>>>
>>>>> analyzing CPU 6:
>>>>>    driver: amd-pstate-epp
>>>>>    CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 6
>>>>>    CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 6
>>>>>    maximum transition latency:  Cannot determine or is not supported.
>>>>>    hardware limits: 400 MHz - 3.50 GHz
>>>>>    available cpufreq governors: performance powersave
>>>>>    current policy: frequency should be within 400 MHz and 3.50 GHz.
>>>>>                    The governor "powersave" may decide which speed to use
>>>>>                    within this range.
>>>>>    current CPU frequency: Unable to call hardware
>>>>>    current CPU frequency: 3.50 GHz (asserted by call to kernel)
>>>>>    boost state support:
>>>>>      Supported: yes
>>>>>      Active: yes
>>>>>      AMD PSTATE Highest Performance: 255. Maximum Frequency: 3.50
>> GHz.
>>>>>      AMD PSTATE Nominal Performance: 204. Nominal Frequency: 2.80
>> GHz.
>>>>>      AMD PSTATE Lowest Non-linear Performance: 124. Lowest
>>>>> Non-linear
>>>> Frequency: 1.70 GHz.
>>>>>      AMD PSTATE Lowest Performance: 30. Lowest Frequency: 400 MHz.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would greatly appreciate any feedbacks.
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>> Perry.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v11:
>>>>>   * minmor change for patch 1 "perf" change to "performance"(Huang
>>>>> ray)
>>>>>   * rebased to lastest linux-pm/bleeding-edge branch
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v10:
>>>>>   * pick ack-by flags from huang ray for all patches.
>>>>>   * run testing on AMD Ryzen 5 7640U without regression issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v9:
>>>>>   * pick review by flag from Meng Li
>>>>>   * pick test by flag from Ugwekar Dhananjay
>>>>>   * picl review by flag from Gautham R. Shenoy
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v8:
>>>>>   * add commit log for patch 1 and patch 2 (Rafael)
>>>>>   * add missing Perry signed-off-by for new patches #1,#2,#4
>>>>> (Rafael)
>>>>>   * rebased to latest linux-pm/bleeding-edge
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v7:
>>>>>   * Gautham helped to invole some new improved patches into the
>> patchset.
>>>>>   * Adds comments for cpudata->{min,max}_limit_{perf,freq},
>>>>> variables [New
>>>> Patch].
>>>>>   * Clarifies that the units for cpudata->*_freq is in khz via
>>>>> comments [New
>>>> Patch].
>>>>>   * Implements the unified computation of all cpudata->*_freq
>>>>>   * v7 Patch 2/6 was dropped which is not needed any more
>>>>>   * moved the quirk check to the amd_pstate_get_freq() function
>>>>>   * pick up RB flags from Gautham
>>>>>   * After the cleanup in patch 3, we don't need the helpers
>>>>>     amd_get_{min,max,nominal,lowest_nonlinear}_freq(). This
>>>>>     patch removes it [New Patch].
>>>>>   * testing done on APU system as well, no regression found.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v6:
>>>>>   * add one new patch to initialize capabilities in
>>>>>     amd_pstate_init_perf which can avoid duplicate cppc capabilities read
>>>>>     the change has been tested on APU system.
>>>>>   * pick up RB flags from Gautham
>>>>>   * drop the patch 1/6 which has been merged by Rafael
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v5:
>>>>>   * rebased to linux-pm v6.8
>>>>>   * pick up RB flag from for patch 6(Mario)
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v4:
>>>>>   * improve the dmi matching rule with zen2 flag only
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v3:
>>>>>   * change quirk matching broken BIOS with family/model ID and Zen2
>>>>>     flag to fix the CPPC definition issue
>>>>>   * fix typo in quirk
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v2:
>>>>>   * change quirk matching to BIOS version and release (Mario)
>>>>>   * pick up RB flag from Mario
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes from v1:
>>>>>   * pick up the RB flags from Mario
>>>>>   * address review comment of patch #6 for amd_get_nominal_freq()
>>>>>   * rebased the series to linux-pm/bleeding-edge v6.8.0-rc2
>>>>>   * update debug log for patch #5 as Mario suggested.
>>>>>   * fix some typos and format problems
>>>>>   * tested on 7950X platform
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> V1:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/63c2b3d7-083a-4daa-ba40-
>>>> 629b3223a92d@mail
>>>>> box.org/
>>>>> V2:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1706863981.git.perry.yuan@amd.co
>>>>> m/
>>>>> v3:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1707016927.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v4:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1707193566.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v5:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1707273526.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v6:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1707363758.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v7:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1710323410.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v8:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1710754409.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v9:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1710836407.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v10:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1711335714.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>> v11:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1713858800.git.perry.yuan@amd.c
>>>>> om/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gautham R. Shenoy (3):
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Document *_limit_* fields in struct amd_cpudata
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Document the units for freq variables in
>>>>>      amd_cpudata
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Remove
>>>>>      amd_get_{min,max,nominal,lowest_nonlinear}_freq()
>>>>>
>>>>> Perry Yuan (5):
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Unify computation of
>>>>>      {max,min,nominal,lowest_nonlinear}_freq
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Bail out if min/max/nominal_freq is 0
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: get transition delay and latency value from ACPI
>>>>>      tables
>>>>>    cppc_acpi: print error message if CPPC is unsupported
>>>>>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add quirk for the pstate CPPC capabilities
>>>>>      missing
>>>>>
>>>>>   drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c     |   4 +-
>>>>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> ----
>>>>>   include/linux/amd-pstate.h   |  20 ++-
>>>>>   3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Whole series applied as 6.10 material, thanks!
>>>
>>> Thank you so much for merging the changes!
>>
>> No problem.
>>
>> However, there are compiler warnings in the new material that need to be
>> addressed before it goes into linux-next.
>>
>> I've seen your patch addressing some of them, but there is still an unused local
>> variable to deal with.
> 
> Thanks for your reminder.
> I have got that fixed with two patches.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240430074857.2069301-1-perry.yuan@amd.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240430074857.2069301-2-perry.yuan@amd.com/
> 
> Hi @Limonciello, Mario @Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal
> Please help to review and ack the patch for patches merging.
> 
> Perry.

They're simple and obviously correct and Rafael picked those two up 
already this morning it looks.

Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-30 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25  8:07 [PATCH v12 0/8] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Document *_limit_* fields in struct amd_cpudata Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Document the units for freq variables in amd_cpudata Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Unify computation of {max,min,nominal,lowest_nonlinear}_freq Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Remove amd_get_{min,max,nominal,lowest_nonlinear}_freq() Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Bail out if min/max/nominal_freq is 0 Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: get transition delay and latency value from ACPI tables Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] cppc_acpi: print error message if CPPC is unsupported Perry Yuan
2024-04-25  8:07 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add quirk for the pstate CPPC capabilities missing Perry Yuan
2024-04-26 17:37 ` [PATCH v12 0/8] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-29  2:56   ` Yuan, Perry
2024-04-29 17:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-30  7:55       ` Yuan, Perry
2024-04-30 16:32         ` Mario Limonciello [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21068e37-38fb-478c-8ec1-e41b0cd450e2@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Borislav.Petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=Li.Meng@amd.com \
    --cc=Perry.Yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Shimmer.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Xiaojian.Du@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).