Linux-PM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Xinmei.Huang@amd.com,
	Xiaojian.Du@amd.com, Li.Meng@amd.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Ray.Huang@amd.com,
	gautham.shenoy@amd.com, Borislav.Petkov@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limit performance
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:23:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fc36c91-1552-4929-8fac-c76b217e1c03@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8feaf14acbe2e8288a5e8e927b8da479819bc71.1715065568.git.perry.yuan@amd.com>

On 5/7/2024 02:15, Perry Yuan wrote:
> To address the performance drop issue, an optimization has been implemented.
> The incorrect highest performance value previously set by the low-level power
> firmware for AMD CPUs with Family ID 0x19 and Model ID ranging from 0x70 to 0x7F
> series has been identified as the cause.
> 
> To resolve this, a check has been implemented to accurately determine the CPU family
> and model ID. The correct highest performance value is now set and the performance
> drop caused by the incorrect highest performance value are eliminated.
> 
> Before the fix, the highest frequency was set to 4200MHz, now it is set
> to 4971MHz which is correct.
> 
> CPU NODE SOCKET CORE L1d:L1i:L2:L3 ONLINE    MAXMHZ   MINMHZ       MHZ
>    0    0      0    0 0:0:0:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
>    1    0      0    0 0:0:0:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
>    2    0      0    1 1:1:1:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000 4865.8140
>    3    0      0    1 1:1:1:0          yes 4971.0000 400.0000  400.0000
> 
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218759
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 7fe8a8fc6227..3ff381c4edf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ static u32 amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   {
>   	u32 highest_perf;
>   	int core_type;
> +	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
>   
>   	core_type = amd_pstate_get_cpu_type(cpudata->cpu);
>   	pr_debug("core_type %d found\n", core_type);
> @@ -355,6 +356,13 @@ static u32 amd_pstate_highest_perf_set(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>   	switch (core_type) {
>   	case CPU_CORE_TYPE_NO_HETERO_SUP:
>   		highest_perf = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_DEFAULT;
> +		/*
> +		 * For AMD CPUs with Family ID 19H and Model ID range 0x70 to 0x7F,
> +		 * the highest performance level is set to 196.
> +		 * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218759
> +		 */
> +		if (c->x86 == 0x19 && (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model <= 0x7F))
> +			highest_perf = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;

I agree this is the right type of change to make for the reported issue, 
but since it's actually a performance regression from 6.9, can you move 
this to the start of the series and add a Fixes tag and stable tag so we 
can get the regression fixed for 6.10 and 6.9.y?

This will of course mean you need to adjust patch 9 as well for such a 
change, but I think it's better this specific patch goes into 6.10 as a 
fix and the rest of the series can aim for 6.11.

>   		break;
>   	case CPU_CORE_TYPE_PERFORMANCE:
>   		highest_perf = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07  7:15 [PATCH 00/11] AMD Pstate Driver Fixes and Improvements Perry Yuan
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: optimiza the initial frequency values verification Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 14:44   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07 21:02   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: show CPPC debug message if CPPC is not supported Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 14:45   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: add debug message while CPPC is supported and disabled by SBIOS Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 14:55   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] Documentation: PM: amd-pstate: introducing recommended reboot requirement during driver switch Perry Yuan
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] Documentation: PM: amd-pstate: add debugging section for driver loading failure Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 15:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] Documentation: PM: amd-pstate: add guide mode to the Operation mode Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 15:02   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: switch boot_cpu_has() to cpu_feature_enabled() Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 15:03   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/cpufeatures: Add feature bits for AMD heterogeneous processor Perry Yuan
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: implement heterogeneous core topology for highest performance initialization Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 15:19   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-09 16:36     ` Yuan, Perry
2024-05-07 18:14   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-07 19:40   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limit performance Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 15:23   ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-05-07  7:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] cpufreq: amd-pstate: automatically load pstate driver by default Perry Yuan
2024-05-07 14:41   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-08 15:20     ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2024-05-08 15:24       ` Yuan, Perry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fc36c91-1552-4929-8fac-c76b217e1c03@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Borislav.Petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=Li.Meng@amd.com \
    --cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Xiaojian.Du@amd.com \
    --cc=Xinmei.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).