Hello Thierry,

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:25:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Instead of allocating extra data in .request() provide the needed memory
> > in struct berlin_pwm_chip. This reduces the number of allocations. A side
> > effect is that on suspend and resume the state for all four channels is
> > always saved and restored. This is easier (and probably quicker) than
> > looking up the matching pwm_device and checking its PWMF_REQUESTED bit.
> 
> I noticed you applied the other three patches in this series, but
> skipped this one and marked it as rejected.
> 
> Please point out what you don't like about this patch instead of just
> dropping it without comment.

Any news on this? I still consider the patch good and would like to know
your objections.

Best regards
Uwe


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |