Hello,

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that
> the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need
> to be repeated.
> 
> This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Binbin Zhou (6):
>   dt-bindings: pwm: bcm2835: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: marvell,pxa: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,pwm-disp: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: snps,dw-apb-timers: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml    | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/marvell,pxa-pwm.yaml       | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml   | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml     | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.yaml           | 1 -
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml         | 1 -
>  6 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

Applied the series to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/renesas,tpu-pwm.yaml seems to be
another candidate for a similar cleanup.

Thanks for your cleanup,
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |