Linux-remoteproc Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hwspinlock: improve locking safety by using raw_spinlock_t
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 22:38:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240824143847.5307-1-wen.yang@linux.dev> (raw)

Both __hwspin_trylock and __hwspin_unlock use hwlock->lock, and require
running in atomic context, with a special annotation:
function will never sleep.
However, this requirement is not fulfilled on PREEMPT_RT.

To address it, use raw_spinlock_t instead of spin_lock_t.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c     | 20 ++++++++++----------
 drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_internal.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
index 6505261e6068..76e5a6c645b1 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
@@ -111,17 +111,17 @@ int __hwspin_trylock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 	 */
 	switch (mode) {
 	case HWLOCK_IRQSTATE:
-		ret = spin_trylock_irqsave(&hwlock->lock, *flags);
+		ret = raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&hwlock->lock, *flags);
 		break;
 	case HWLOCK_IRQ:
-		ret = spin_trylock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
+		ret = raw_spin_trylock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
 		break;
 	case HWLOCK_RAW:
 	case HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC:
 		ret = 1;
 		break;
 	default:
-		ret = spin_trylock(&hwlock->lock);
+		ret = raw_spin_trylock(&hwlock->lock);
 		break;
 	}
 
@@ -136,17 +136,17 @@ int __hwspin_trylock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 	if (!ret) {
 		switch (mode) {
 		case HWLOCK_IRQSTATE:
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwlock->lock, *flags);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwlock->lock, *flags);
 			break;
 		case HWLOCK_IRQ:
-			spin_unlock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
 			break;
 		case HWLOCK_RAW:
 		case HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC:
 			/* Nothing to do */
 			break;
 		default:
-			spin_unlock(&hwlock->lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&hwlock->lock);
 			break;
 		}
 
@@ -289,17 +289,17 @@ void __hwspin_unlock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 	/* Undo the spin_trylock{_irq, _irqsave} called while locking */
 	switch (mode) {
 	case HWLOCK_IRQSTATE:
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwlock->lock, *flags);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwlock->lock, *flags);
 		break;
 	case HWLOCK_IRQ:
-		spin_unlock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
 		break;
 	case HWLOCK_RAW:
 	case HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC:
 		/* Nothing to do */
 		break;
 	default:
-		spin_unlock(&hwlock->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&hwlock->lock);
 		break;
 	}
 }
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ int hwspin_lock_register(struct hwspinlock_device *bank, struct device *dev,
 	for (i = 0; i < num_locks; i++) {
 		hwlock = &bank->lock[i];
 
-		spin_lock_init(&hwlock->lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_init(&hwlock->lock);
 		hwlock->bank = bank;
 
 		ret = hwspin_lock_register_single(hwlock, base_id + i);
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_internal.h b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_internal.h
index f298fc0ee5ad..9fbd66e8a82f 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_internal.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct hwspinlock_ops {
  */
 struct hwspinlock {
 	struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
-	spinlock_t lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t lock;
 	void *priv;
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-08-24 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-24 14:38 Wen Yang [this message]
2024-08-26 16:37 ` [PATCH] hwspinlock: improve locking safety by using raw_spinlock_t Bjorn Andersson
2024-09-01 13:34   ` Wen Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240824143847.5307-1-wen.yang@linux.dev \
    --to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).