From: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: "Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"Suman Anna" <s-anna@ti.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Udit Kumar" <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
"Thomas Richard" <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>,
"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Hari Nagalla" <hnagalla@ti.com>,
"Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: support for graceful stop of remote cores
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:50:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33d97f00-dd9a-4643-8210-859c2ab38a97@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621150058.319524-5-richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
On 6/21/24 10:00 AM, Richard Genoud wrote:
> Introduce software IPC handshake between the K3-R5 remote proc driver
> and the R5 MCU to gracefully stop/reset the remote core.
>
> Upon a stop request, K3-R5 remote proc driver sends a RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN
> mailbox message to the remote R5 core.
> The remote core is expected to:
> - relinquish all the resources acquired through Device Manager (DM)
> - disable its interrupts
> - send back a mailbox acknowledgment RP_MBOX_SHUDOWN_ACK
> - enter WFI state.
>
> Meanwhile, the K3-R5 remote proc driver does:
> - wait for the RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN_ACK from the remote core
> - wait for the remote proc to enter WFI state
> - reset the remote core through device manager
>
> Based on work from: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h | 9 +++++-
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h
> index 828e13256c02..c008f11fa2a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
> * @RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_CANCEL: a cancel suspend response from a remote processor
> * on a suspend request
> *
> + * @RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN: shutdown request for the remote processor
> + *
> + * @RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN_ACK: successful response from remote processor for a
> + * shutdown request. The remote processor should be in WFI state short after.
> + *
> * Introduce new message definitions if any here.
> *
> * @RP_MBOX_END_MSG: Indicates end of known/defined messages from remote core
> @@ -59,7 +64,9 @@ enum omap_rp_mbox_messages {
> RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_SYSTEM = 0xFFFFFF11,
> RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_ACK = 0xFFFFFF12,
> RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_CANCEL = 0xFFFFFF13,
> - RP_MBOX_END_MSG = 0xFFFFFF14,
> + RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN = 0xFFFFFF14,
> + RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN_ACK = 0xFFFFFF15,
> + RP_MBOX_END_MSG = 0xFFFFFF16,
> };
>
> #endif /* _OMAP_RPMSG_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index a2ead87952c7..918a15e1dd9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> #include <linux/suspend.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> @@ -172,8 +173,23 @@ struct k3_r5_rproc {
> struct k3_r5_core *core;
> struct k3_r5_mem *rmem;
> int num_rmems;
> + struct completion shutdown_complete;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * This will return true if the remote core is in Wait For Interrupt state.
> + */
> +static bool k3_r5_is_core_in_wfi(struct k3_r5_core *core)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u64 boot_vec;
> + u32 cfg, ctrl, stat;
> +
> + ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, &stat);
> +
> + return !ret ? !!(stat & PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_WFI) : false;
Too fancy for me :) Just return if (ret) right after get_status().
Looks like this function is called in a polling loop, if
ti_sci_proc_get_status() fails once, it won't get better,
no need to keep checking, we should just error out of
the polling loop.
Andrew
> +}
> +
> /**
> * k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler
> * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel
> @@ -209,6 +225,10 @@ static void k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
> case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY:
> dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name);
> break;
> + case RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN_ACK:
> + dev_dbg(dev, "received shutdown_ack from %s\n", name);
> + complete(&kproc->shutdown_complete);
> + break;
> default:
> /* silently handle all other valid messages */
> if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG)
> @@ -634,6 +654,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster;
> struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> struct k3_r5_core *core1, *core = kproc->core;
> + bool wfi;
> int ret;
>
>
> @@ -650,6 +671,24 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Send SHUTDOWN message to remote proc */
> + reinit_completion(&kproc->shutdown_complete);
> + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_SHUTDOWN);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Sending SHUTDOWN message failed: %d. Halting core anyway.\n", ret);
> + } else {
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&kproc->shutdown_complete,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Timeout waiting SHUTDOWN_ACK message. Halting core anyway.\n");
> + } else {
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(k3_r5_is_core_in_wfi, core,
> + wfi, wfi, 200, 2000);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "Timeout waiting for remote proc to be in WFI state. Halting core anyway.\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* halt all applicable cores */
> if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP) {
> list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
> @@ -1410,6 +1449,7 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_config;
> }
>
> + init_completion(&kproc->shutdown_complete);
> init_rmem:
> k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(kproc);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 15:00 [PATCH 0/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce suspend to ram support Richard Genoud
2024-06-21 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection Richard Genoud
2024-06-28 19:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-06-28 19:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-01 9:13 ` Hari Nagalla
2024-07-01 16:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-06-21 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce PM suspend/resume handlers Richard Genoud
2024-06-28 20:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-01 7:30 ` Richard GENOUD
2024-07-01 19:02 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-21 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: k3_r5_rproc_stop: code reorder Richard Genoud
2024-06-28 21:18 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-01 8:03 ` Richard GENOUD
2024-07-01 16:35 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-01 16:49 ` Richard GENOUD
2024-06-21 15:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: support for graceful stop of remote cores Richard Genoud
2024-06-28 21:20 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-01 16:38 ` Richard GENOUD
2024-06-28 22:50 ` Andrew Davis [this message]
2024-07-01 16:48 ` Richard GENOUD
2024-07-01 21:55 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-28 21:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce suspend to ram support Mathieu Poirier
2024-07-01 9:59 ` Hari Nagalla
2024-07-08 7:33 ` Richard GENOUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33d97f00-dd9a-4643-8210-859c2ab38a97@ti.com \
--to=afd@ti.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).