Linux-remoteproc Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Cc: <andersson@kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
	<iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>, <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Alexandru Lastur <alexandru.lastur@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] remoteproc: core: Add support for predefined notifyids
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:38:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75427b09-6823-426e-b0dc-66caf97abbea@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxkW9SUr91PyH9c/@p14s>

hello

On 10/23/24 17:32, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:09:29PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>> Currently we generate notifyids in the linux kernel and override
>> those found in rsc_table.
>>
>> This doesn't play well with users expecting to use the exact ids
>> from rsc_table.
>>
>> So, use predefined notifyids found in rsc_table if any. Otherwise,
>> let Linux generate the ids as before.
>>
>> Keypoint is we also define an invalid notifid as 0xFFFFFFFFU. This
>> should be placed as notifids if users want Linux to generate the ids.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Lastur <alexandru.lastur@nxp.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index f276956f2c5c..9f00fe16da38 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>>  	int ret, notifyid;
>>  	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>>  	size_t size;
>> +	int start, end;
>>  
>>  	/* actual size of vring (in bytes) */
>>  	size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(rvring->num, rvring->align));
>> @@ -363,9 +364,18 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Assign an rproc-wide unique index for this vring
>>  	 * TODO: assign a notifyid for rvdev updates as well
>> -	 * TODO: support predefined notifyids (via resource table)
>>  	 */
>> -	ret = idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +	start = 0;
>> +	end = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* use id if specified in rsc table */
>> +	if (rsc->vring[i].notifyid != RSC_INVALID_NOTIFYID) {
>> +		start = rsc->vring[i].notifyid;
>> +		end = start + 1;
>> +	}
> 
> This will likely introduce a backward compatibility issue where anyone that
> has more than one vring and set their notifyids to anything else than 0xFFFFFFFF
> in the resource table will see a boot failure.
> 
> A while back the openAMP group started discussions on using the configuration
> space of a virtio device to enhance device discovery, with exactly this kind of
> use case in mind.  I think it is the only way to move forward with this
> feature, though it is a big job that requires a lot of community interactions.
> 
FYI a PR exists in OpenAMP to use this configuration space to customize the
size of the buffers [2].

This probably means we need something scalable for the configuration space.

I guess your objective is to match the vring ID with the mailbox channel ID, right?
We have a similar issue with the STM32MP1/2. It is hard-coded in the stm32_rproc
driver[1], which is far from perfect because it is not simple to add a new vdev
instance.

I would have two other alternatives to highlight

- An alternative could be to have a vendor resource in the resource table and
use rproc_handle_rsc operations. This resource would define the match between the
vrings IDs and the mailbox IDs.
However, if several vendors are facing the same issue, perhaps better to find a
generic solution.

- another alternative already discussed several times in openAMP group would be
to define a new version of the resource table.

[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11/source/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c#L328
[2] https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp/pull/155

Regards
Arnaud

> Regards,
> Mathieu
> 
>> +
>> +	ret = idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, start, end, GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (ret < 0) {
>>  		dev_err(dev, "idr_alloc failed: %d\n", ret);
>>  		return ret;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> index b4795698d8c2..98c3e181086e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ struct fw_rsc_trace {
>>  	u8 name[32];
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>> +#define RSC_INVALID_NOTIFYID 0xFFFFFFFFU
>>  /**
>>   * struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring - vring descriptor entry
>>   * @da: device address
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-25 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-18 11:09 [RFC PATCH] remoteproc: core: Add support for predefined notifyids Daniel Baluta
2024-10-23 15:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-10-25 20:38   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2024-10-30 14:04   ` Daniel Baluta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75427b09-6823-426e-b0dc-66caf97abbea@foss.st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexandru.lastur@nxp.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=iuliana.prodan@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).