Linux-remoteproc Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beleswar Prasad Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
To: <andersson@kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: <afd@ti.com>, <hnagalla@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
	<p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <jkangas@redhat.com>,
	<eballetbo@redhat.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/20] remoteproc: k3-m4: Prevent Mailbox level IPC with detached core
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:19:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b771d045-9b37-4fb3-8257-6c56a3942755@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103101231.1508151-2-b-padhi@ti.com>


On 03/01/25 15:42, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> Inter-Processor Communication is facilitated through mailbox payloads,
> which typically contains the index of the triggered virtqueue having the
> actual data to be consumed, but the payload can also be used for trivial
> communication, like sending an echo message or notifying a crash etc.
> When the core is detached, the virtqueues are freed, and thus the Virtio
> level IPC is not functional. However, Mailbox IPC is still possible with
> trivial payloads.
>
> Therefore, introduce checks in k3_m4_rproc_kick() and
> k3_m4_rproc_mbox_callback() functions to return early without parsing
> the payload when core is detached, and is not undergoing an attach
> operation in IPC-only mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> index a16fb165fced..3201c3684a86 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
>   /**
>    * struct k3_m4_rproc - k3 remote processor driver structure
>    * @dev: cached device pointer
> + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle
>    * @mem: internal memory regions data
>    * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions
>    * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
> @@ -60,9 +61,11 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
>    * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
>    * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
>    * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
> + * @is_attach_ongoing: flag to indicate if IPC-only "attach()" is in progress


Note: This variable naming will be changed to 'is_attached' (for better 
clarity) in the next revision. I wish to take more feedback for the 
whole series before posting next revision.

Thanks,
Beleswar

>    */
>   struct k3_m4_rproc {
>   	struct device *dev;
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
>   	struct k3_m4_rproc_mem *mem;
>   	int num_mems;
>   	struct k3_m4_rproc_mem *rmem;
> @@ -73,6 +76,7 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc {
>   	u32 ti_sci_id;
>   	struct mbox_chan *mbox;
>   	struct mbox_client client;
> +	bool is_attach_ongoing;
>   };
>   
>   /**
> @@ -93,8 +97,16 @@ static void k3_m4_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
>   {
>   	struct device *dev = client->dev;
>   	struct rproc *rproc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
>   	u32 msg = (u32)(uintptr_t)(data);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not forward messages from a detached core, except when the core
> +	 * is in the process of being attached in IPC-only mode.
> +	 */
> +	if (!kproc->is_attach_ongoing && kproc->rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
> +		return;
> +
>   	dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
>   
>   	switch (msg) {
> @@ -135,6 +147,12 @@ static void k3_m4_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>   	u32 msg = (u32)vqid;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not forward messages to a detached core, except when the core
> +	 * is in the process of being attached in IPC-only mode.
> +	 */
> +	if (!kproc->is_attach_ongoing && kproc->rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
> +		return;
>   	/*
>   	 * Send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload.
>   	 * NOTE: msg is cast to uintptr_t to prevent compiler warnings when
> @@ -515,15 +533,19 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>   /*
>    * Attach to a running M4 remote processor (IPC-only mode)
>    *
> - * The remote processor is already booted, so there is no need to issue any
> - * TI-SCI commands to boot the M4 core. This callback is used only in IPC-only
> - * mode.
> + * This rproc attach callback only needs to set the "is_attach_ongoing" flag to
> + * notify k3_m4_rproc_{kick/mbox_callback} functions that the core is in the
> + * process of getting attached in IPC-only mode. The remote processor is already
> + * booted, so there is no need to issue any TI-SCI commands to boot the M4 core.
> + * This callback is used only in IPC-only mode.
>    */
>   static int k3_m4_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
>   {
>   	struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	kproc->is_attach_ongoing = true;
> +
>   	ret = k3_m4_rproc_ping_mbox(kproc);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> @@ -534,12 +556,18 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
>   /*
>    * Detach from a running M4 remote processor (IPC-only mode)
>    *
> - * This rproc detach callback performs the opposite operation to attach
> - * callback, the M4 core is not stopped and will be left to continue to
> - * run its booted firmware. This callback is invoked only in IPC-only mode.
> + * This rproc detach callback performs the opposite operation to attach callback
> + * and only needs to clear the "is_attach_ongoing" flag to ensure no mailbox
> + * messages are sent to or received from a detached core. The M4 core is not
> + * stopped and will be left to continue to run its booted firmware. This
> + * callback is invoked only in IPC-only mode.
>    */
>   static int k3_m4_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>   {
> +	struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	kproc->is_attach_ongoing = false;
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -577,6 +605,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	rproc->has_iommu = false;
>   	rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
>   	kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	kproc->rproc = rproc;
>   	kproc->dev = dev;
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-03 10:12 [PATCH v8 00/20] Refactor TI K3 DSP and M4 Drivers Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 01/20] remoteproc: k3-m4: Prevent Mailbox level IPC with detached core Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-08  8:49   ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi [this message]
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 02/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor shared data structures Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 03/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor mailbox rx_callback functions into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 04/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .kick rproc ops " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 05/20] remoteproc: k3-m4: Use k3_rproc_mem_data structure for memory info Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 06/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_reset() implementation into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 07/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_release() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 08/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_request_mbox() implementations " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 09/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .prepare rproc ops " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 10/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .unprepare " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 11/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .start " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 12/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .stop " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 13/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .attach " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 14/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .detach " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 15/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .get_loaded_rsc_table " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 16/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .da_to_va rproc " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 17/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor of_get_memories() functions " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 18/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor mem_release() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 19/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor reserved_mem_init() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 20/20] remoteproc: k3: Refactor release_tsp() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-01-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v8 00/20] Refactor TI K3 DSP and M4 Drivers Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-01-08 15:03 ` Andrew Davis
2025-01-10 14:56   ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b771d045-9b37-4fb3-8257-6c56a3942755@ti.com \
    --to=b-padhi@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=eballetbo@redhat.com \
    --cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jkangas@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).