From: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/9] remoteproc: k3: Factor out TI-SCI processor control OF get function
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:49:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da62f142-cf93-4d64-bb1e-71fa5270c09a@phytec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240802152109.137243-3-afd@ti.com>
Am 02.08.24 um 17:21 schrieb Andrew Davis:
> Building the TSP structure is common for users of the TI-SCI processor
> control interface. Factor out this function and put it with the rest
> of the TI-SCI processor control functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Tested-by: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 28 +----------------------
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 28 +----------------------
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> index a22d41689a7d2..1585769092924 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -636,32 +636,6 @@ static void k3_dsp_release_tsp(void *data)
> ti_sci_proc_release(tsp);
> }
>
> -static
> -struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
> - const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
> -{
> - struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> - u32 temp[2];
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids",
> - temp, 2);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> -
> - tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!tsp)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> - tsp->dev = dev;
> - tsp->sci = sci;
> - tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
> - tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
> - tsp->host_id = temp[1];
> -
> - return tsp;
> -}
> -
> static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -711,7 +685,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset),
> "failed to get reset\n");
>
> - kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
> + kproc->tsp = ti_sci_proc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
> if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp),
> "failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 39a47540c5900..dd6294ab81e2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -1533,32 +1533,6 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static
> -struct ti_sci_proc *k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
> - const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
> -{
> - struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> - u32 temp[2];
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-proc-ids",
> - temp, 2);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> -
> - tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!tsp)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> - tsp->dev = dev;
> - tsp->sci = sci;
> - tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
> - tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
> - tsp->host_id = temp[1];
> -
> - return tsp;
> -}
> -
> static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1633,7 +1607,7 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err;
> }
>
> - core->tsp = k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(dev, core->ti_sci);
> + core->tsp = ti_sci_proc_of_get_tsp(dev, core->ti_sci);
> if (IS_ERR(core->tsp)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(core->tsp);
> dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
> index 778558abcdcc5..f3911ce75252e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,32 @@ struct ti_sci_proc {
> u8 host_id;
> };
>
> +static inline
> +struct ti_sci_proc *ti_sci_proc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
> + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
> +{
> + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> + u32 temp[2];
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-proc-ids",
> + temp, 2);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tsp)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + tsp->dev = dev;
> + tsp->sci = sci;
> + tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
> + tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
> + tsp->host_id = temp[1];
> +
> + return tsp;
> +}
> +
> static inline int ti_sci_proc_request(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp)
> {
> int ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 15:21 [PATCH v11 0/9] TI K3 M4F support on AM62 and AM64 SoCs Andrew Davis
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add K3 AM64x SoCs Andrew Davis
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] remoteproc: k3: Factor out TI-SCI processor control OF get function Andrew Davis
2024-08-19 8:49 ` Wadim Egorov [this message]
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] remoteproc: k3-m4: Add a remoteproc driver for M4F subsystem Andrew Davis
2024-08-15 16:46 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-16 14:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-19 8:32 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2024-08-19 15:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-19 15:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-19 15:54 ` Andrew Davis
2024-08-21 17:12 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-19 8:47 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: Add M4F remoteproc node Andrew Davis
2024-08-19 8:48 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: " Andrew Davis
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: " Andrew Davis
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-sk: " Andrew Davis
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm: " Andrew Davis
2024-08-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] arm64: defconfig: Enable TI K3 M4 remoteproc driver Andrew Davis
2025-01-08 7:31 ` Daniel Schultz
2024-08-19 8:33 ` [PATCH v11 0/9] TI K3 M4F support on AM62 and AM64 SoCs Wadim Egorov
2025-01-08 15:49 ` (subset) " Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da62f142-cf93-4d64-bb1e-71fa5270c09a@phytec.de \
--to=w.egorov@phytec.de \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).