From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger@dilger.ca>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Ext4 Developers List" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>,
"Anders Roxell" <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>
Subject: Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:31:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240417153122.GE2277619@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417003639.13bfd801@namcao>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:36:39AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
>
> However, I am confused about one thing: doesn't this make one page of
> physical memory inaccessible?
So are these riscv32 systems really having multiple terabytes of
memory? Why is this page in the physical memory map in the first
place?
Inquiring minds what to know,
- Ted
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 14:57 riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression? Björn Töpel
2024-04-12 15:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-12 16:59 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-13 4:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-13 10:01 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-13 14:43 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-14 0:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-14 1:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-14 2:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-14 2:18 ` Al Viro
2024-04-14 2:15 ` Al Viro
2024-04-14 4:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-14 14:08 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-15 13:04 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-15 16:04 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 6:44 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 8:25 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-16 11:02 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 14:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 15:17 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 15:30 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 15:56 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 16:19 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 16:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 18:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 22:36 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-17 15:31 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2024-04-17 18:06 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-17 19:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 22:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-18 9:17 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 18:05 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 18:09 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 16:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 16:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 18:18 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240417153122.GE2277619@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).