From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C21C433F5 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:58:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rhTgMvqV759YO3Xpsu7LFzx5CJN3GMYmUUKsLCgCqWI=; b=BRFSsd0NB8opep Z8/FGVvFD9/t8y4yXSPCxPBXH6kAwMGmsMv/lWSE5VpSxyJoiiRaKdG0/mDyGIigJHh9/Ut1uD1QE juqh3i/MSpE+Ud5EW5y8KzXIwtdLH06hFRokqZOAsnVapt4o6lUw6S9+piSXXuAZF2434HqV1bFe2 blleTWE9WWlRlchVD6C1PS0Tu/fn/WgBEvZvXtoPiK77KOP2QyMQDRxSisX1BlIi4o7hSTqR1aX0i 1wpVa2sJ2lydZW/pUGSW1AKhxm6uURZevWJrhOUV8F2GwM0h1Xz5Gh30pGy7V5zSgPZ3mEIXGDHNt 6IcAtixJf8AZlol/sQiw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n028Y-00AcGR-2W; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:58:34 +0000 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n028U-00AcFC-ME for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:58:32 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [213.165.67.113]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N8nnU-1mNAZe187i-015tPO for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:58:28 +0100 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id o19-20020a1c7513000000b0033a93202467so1535303wmc.2 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:58:28 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gYnz0sJXrgiR1hgb47tYO4uk70e12RvBZ4drGBAT/MzSt8Lz9 Rtp5Cwcb6OGJJvXEqB78X+HoAbvt7c0QK4db/9A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHZHEwLAEwqHridYfJm7TlWCGLjIEDeHHUir8Cs1kP3HuMbH2jN9G4hTgoKteiOAzPC+bhvI86kuxZaYPixlc= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c198:: with SMTP id y24mr961837wmi.1.1640179840757; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:30:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211221163532.2636028-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20211221163532.2636028-3-guoren@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:30:24 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig To: Guo Ren Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Palmer Dabbelt , Anup Patel , gregkh , liush , Wei Fu , Drew Fustini , Wang Junqiang , =?UTF-8?B?V2VpIFd1ICjlkLTkvJ8p?= , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-riscv , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ApPev+x1RamUVDBVRTMhmVxWKN5tdNPHUgMLzIIzeZGMVCxnKub LMAIyyPIjNimyXnRL2hlesVxAxfJUirLzcNWSr/QIBV9c4dZnMO5Qj3eKK5VAyDYPZP4z8v YjVMlL6QNj/hbQH6ZEgmgfogxnmowAd6kVpWpWUcmptFVvca6ScpnOcmghVk6P16Io1Bp5x u/WVUPIPflKjUt68dvKKQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:r7hUe3hKOQA=:/2TWLu+NUwEgkpFBvhLxxK nr3bm1sFifPwoUoDr1SW7S5Xb273NEvuV5K4TV98MPgdszsfBDwcBdeafGDmMbntSXBBODhLr 0NFlr0932wfiYMpa/Qv3WVuaNrXgCK2SsQPvaUTVzuCVioFL5TDCmhvdXCrx2eXZE9bN3Dfil m5v2U1ePSoIxAvbr89i00lQGi7gbHzrH++cIeYT58BazgjXqgWHgVd7b2ynqIVDIib9Yr40eP 0Xfv084byC6d03ASFNrRPYq4/YIcVAx2pp8pFMe5r8ftg4GMgBtciwsThstQ28i7+B0u6QQ9u 2uHFqR6cqijVFxLAjufv8rNJIchT5cXyKIMTm0rFZHo3AnuT43IFurSwcjqSIq7Uvm+Swh+iA uy+TTM0SUj7+epsa2Bwt8P1Gf9MRO2SPZcAM8lVdSR/R4pmY1ggGitCdEu9FUYGXhy/aKd1Ov mBM1nQb1XhLF1YGGbv8DZ0lLshSSbdr16OLWdveCm+gdLBkAAWK5B+4P/5de6L1+PPqE8e3i9 GF4DQlQ9g4OOZOJ3C9XeMab15ZDUL1J8aBT2su159tNGumODh+wooZJ1bY5po6bzIzbD24ddy YDSVfymYVu/f/gcOZs8U4ix6K8VMSeqfFl86IKFII/fsGlyqyqBQ24g7vVWMtMD+DzbuJMRjN aI1Nszr1Jh1bmveXdAYx5SftQ8FvEmdEzGJ3lmEbjRRYu+FclKT+M7UVo+QIa66aOOSuc1DyS GLvdd4JxITYZqX5rxv5b5gMbP9IpMRKWHqqB4CQcbvoT4W6MmkWk+6hSCaTy7lP4ih7IWN0Kk OnV222LYQBm3PJJWbGZ0o3WHMpRYNb49mFjvQBEawrk+oROHF4= X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211222_055831_038036_387EF7D7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:06 PM Guo Ren wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:51 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:34 PM Guo Ren wrote: > > Given that there are no specific rv32 SoC implementations supported > > by the kernel today (other than SOC_VIRT), the number of users > > would be close to zero anyway. > I really agree with you, but we still need the rv32 user mode > ecosystem for memory footprint. Sure, I just meant there are few users that would have to relearn typing "make defconfig 32-bit.config" instead of "make rv32_defconfig" even without the added Makefile target. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv