Linux-Security-Module Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org>,
	 Allen Webb <allenwebb@google.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>,
	 Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
	 Matt Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] selftests/landlock: Test IOCTLs on named pipes
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 16:04:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240322.Eyi5ieg8oxae@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zf2YO8LHm3Wi4aNu@google.com>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:39:55PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:48:29AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > It might be interesting to create a layout with one file of each type
> > and use that for the IOCTL tests.
> 
> We have already written these tests and we can keep them, but I think that we
> only gain little additional confidence from testing non-device files.  The
> implementation is saying pretty directly that IOCTLs are permitted if the file
> is not a character or block device, at the top of the file_ioctl hook.  I don't
> see much value in testing this even more exhaustively and would like to keep it
> as it is for now.

OK, let's keep them for now, it's easy to remove a patch/commit.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-22 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-09  7:53 [PATCH v10 0/9] Landlock: IOCTL support Günther Noack
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] security: Create security_file_vfs_ioctl hook Günther Noack
2024-03-14 17:56   ` Paul Moore
2024-03-15 14:58     ` [RFC PATCH] fs: Add an use vfs_get_ioctl_handler() Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-15 18:30     ` [PATCH v10 1/9] security: Create security_file_vfs_ioctl hook Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] landlock: Add IOCTL access right for character and block devices Günther Noack
2024-03-11 14:46   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-11 16:55     ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] selftests/landlock: Test IOCTL support Günther Noack
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] selftests/landlock: Test IOCTL with memfds Günther Noack
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] selftests/landlock: Test ioctl(2) and ftruncate(2) with open(O_PATH) Günther Noack
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] selftests/landlock: Test IOCTLs on named pipes Günther Noack
2024-03-22  7:48   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-22  8:45     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-22 14:39     ` Günther Noack
2024-03-22 15:04       ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] selftests/landlock: Check IOCTL restrictions for named UNIX domain sockets Günther Noack
2024-03-22  7:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-22 14:43     ` Günther Noack
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] samples/landlock: Add support for LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV Günther Noack
2024-03-09  7:53 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] landlock: Document IOCTL support Günther Noack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240322.Eyi5ieg8oxae@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=allenwebb@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dtor@google.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=jeffxu@google.com \
    --cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
    --cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=repnop@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).