Linux-SPI Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@black.fi.intel.com>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] spi: cs42l43: Add bridged cs35l56 amplifiers
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:11:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhZXsLj4NSjbpbh1@ediswmail9.ad.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhWIZFvfYb85Pftm@black.fi.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:26:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > From: Maciej Strozek <mstrozek@opensource.cirrus.com>
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/array_size.h>
> >  #include <linux/bits.h>
> >  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
> 
> Shouldn't you include gpio/property.h as well?
> Ah, in the previous patch you put swnode to consumer.h instead of
> gpio/property.h. Please, fix that.
> 

Sorry not sure I follow here, nothing is using
PROPERTY_ENTRY_GPIO and not sure why that is needed in the swnode
patch either?

> >  #include <linux/mfd/cs42l43.h>
> >  #include <linux/mfd/cs42l43-regs.h>
> >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> 
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> >  #include <linux/units.h>
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static const struct software_node ampl = {
> > +	.name			= "cs35l56-left",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct software_node ampr = {
> > +	.name			= "cs35l56-right",
> > +};
> 
> What these swnodes are for?
> 

The two amps we are adding, not sure I entirely follow what you
are asking here. We need the software nodes so we can name the
amps something such that we can find them from the machine driver
later.

> ...
> 
> > +static bool cs42l43_has_sidecar(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > +	static const u32 func_smart_amp = 0x1;
> > +	struct fwnode_handle *child_fwnode, *ext_fwnode;
> > +	unsigned int val;
> > +	u32 function;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child_fwnode) {
> > +		struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(child_fwnode);
> > +
> > +		if (!adev)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		ret = acpi_get_local_address(adev->handle, &function);
> > +		if (ret || function != func_smart_amp) {
> 
> > +			fwnode_handle_put(child_fwnode);
> 
> Why?
> 

Ah had missed the fwnode_for_each_child will do the put itself,
will fix that up.

> > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(GPIO_SWNODE);
> 
> > +
> 
> Stray blank line.
> 

Fair enough will remove.

Thanks,
Charles

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-10  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-09 13:21 [PATCH 0/3] Add bridged amplifiers to cs42l43 Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] gpio: swnode: Add ability to specify native chip selects for SPI Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 13:50   ` Linus Walleij
2024-04-09 18:03   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-10  8:44     ` Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: Add a mechanism to use the fwnode name for the SPI device Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 14:46   ` Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 18:06   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-10  8:42     ` Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] spi: cs42l43: Add bridged cs35l56 amplifiers Charles Keepax
2024-04-09 18:26   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-10  9:11     ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2024-04-10  7:42   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-10  8:01     ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZhZXsLj4NSjbpbh1@ediswmail9.ad.cirrus.com \
    --to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=andy@black.fi.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).