From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] PCI: endpoint: Rename core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to init()
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:26:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240326075622.GE9565@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zf2tEM1ueugQyJfK@ryzen>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:08:48PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 08:53:42PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > core_init() callback is used to notify the EPC initialization event to the
> > EPF drivers. The 'core' prefix was used indicate that the controller IP
> > core has completed initialization. But it serves no purpose as the EPF
> > driver will only care about the EPC initialization as a whole and there is
> > no real benefit to distinguish the IP core part.
> >
> > So let's rename the core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to
> > just init() to make it more clear.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > include/linux/pci-epf.h | 4 ++--
> > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > index e5d67aec7574..da894a9a447e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_dma_deinit(struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi)
> > epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > -static int pci_epf_mhi_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > +static int pci_epf_mhi_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > {
> > struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info *info = epf_mhi->info;
> > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct pci_epc_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_epc_event_ops = {
> > - .core_init = pci_epf_mhi_core_init,
> > + .init = pci_epf_mhi_epc_init,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct pci_epc_bus_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_bus_event_ops = {
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > index 751dab5799d5..1dae0fce8fc4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > +static int pci_epf_test_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
>
> Why have _epc_ init in the name at all?
>
> Isn't
> static int pci_epf_test_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
>
> Enough?
>
> From my perspective, it is the EPF that is initializing
> (by configuring the BARS according to it's liking),
> not the EPC initializing.
>
Hmm, you are right. It makes sense to remove 'epc' from the naming.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 15:23 [PATCH 00/11] PCI: endpoint: Make host reboot handling more robust Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] PCI: qcom-ep: Disable resources unconditionally during PERST# assert Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:08 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 7:44 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-26 10:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 11:10 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-26 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 13:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-26 10:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] PCI: endpoint: Decouple EPC and PCIe bus specific events Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:08 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 7:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: endpoint: Rename core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to init() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:08 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 7:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: epf-test: Refactor pci_epf_test_unbind() function Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 7:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] PCI: epf-{mhi/test}: Move DMA initialization to EPC init callback Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 8:26 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-26 11:05 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 14:27 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-27 6:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:18 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 11:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-28 18:42 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-04 8:44 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-22 7:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-22 9:30 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] PCI: endpoint: Introduce EPC 'deinit' event and notify the EPF drivers Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 8:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] PCI: dwc: ep: Add a generic dw_pcie_ep_linkdown() API to handle Link Down event Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-27 18:06 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-01 16:34 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] PCI: qcom-ep: Use the " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] PCI: epf-test: Handle " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] PCI: qcom-ep: Rework {start/stop}_link() callbacks implementation Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 8:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-14 15:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] PCI: tegra194: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 16:11 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240326075622.GE9565@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).