linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 linux-um@lists.infradead.org, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: let 'make clean' properly clean underlying SUBARCH as well
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 10:17:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVuQNi02KTCKnsS6V=POsz9X=2003b+CWxwCc=23ULuYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAT_m+R3Keyys2NpmQWRmZzHNv9FM_ALv=vn_WMzTSWhyw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Yamada-san,

On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 10:14, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 4:38 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 07:29, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 15:38 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > > My workflow:
> > > >
> > > > - Build kernel on x86_64 with CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT enabled
> > > >
> > > > - Check for arch/x86/realmode/rm/pasyms.h
> > > >    ls arch/x86/realmode/rm/pasyms.h
> > > >       arch/x86/realmode/rm/pasyms.h
> > > >
> > > > - make ARCH=um O=/linux/build
> > > >
> > > >    This patch cleans the source tree, but doesn't remove
> > > >    arch/x86/realmode/rm/pasyms.h
> > > >
> > > > - ls arch/x86/realmode/rm/pasyms.h
> > > >       arch/x86/realmode/rm/pasyms.h
> > >
> > > Is that even _expected_ to work? If you have x86 built first, I'd almost
> > > expect you to have to do "make ARCH=x86 mrproper" before building
> > > another ARCH. I don't see how ARCH=um would know how to do a full clean
> > > up of ARCH=x86, unless this is somehow arch-independent?
> > >
> > > Or maybe that's not an issue with other architectures because UML is
> > > special in that it uses parts of x86?
> >
> > Probably.
> > I only use my linux-next source tree for fixing reported build issues on
> > various architectures, and I never use make clean/mrproper.  Works fine.
> >
> > > Though I guess the patch here should make it do that, more or less, but
> > > it can't, likely because you're also switching from in-tree build to O=
> > > build?
> >
> > Yeah, mixing in-tree and out-of-tree builds causes issues.
> > Never build in-tree in a source tree you use with O= (except for
> > e.g. "make tags").
>
> I argue this.
>
> You can start out-of-tree builds after running 'make mrproper'
> for the architecture you want to build the kernel for.
>
> Hence, Kbuild suggests to do so when it determines
> the source tree is not clean enough.

Sorry, I meant "without mrproper" (which wipes my tags file).

> Unfortunately, "make mrproper ARCH=um" did not clean the tree
> deeply enough.   Hence, this patch.

Thanks, fine!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07  7:49 [PATCH] um: let 'make clean' properly clean underlying SUBARCH as well Masahiro Yamada
2025-05-07 16:13 ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-07 21:38 ` Shuah Khan
2025-05-07 23:49   ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-05-08 22:14     ` Shuah Khan
2025-05-08 23:43       ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-05-08  5:29   ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-08  7:38     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-05-08  8:14       ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-05-08  8:17         ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2025-05-08  6:12 ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdVuQNi02KTCKnsS6V=POsz9X=2003b+CWxwCc=23ULuYQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).