From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tamizh Chelvam Raja <quic_tamizhr@quicinc.com>,
<ath11k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Venkateswara Naralasetty" <quic_vnaralas@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] wifi: ath11k: skip status ring entry processing
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:14:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f9abe89-a004-45e8-b369-5c2b39bff440@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cyq7ota5.fsf@kernel.org>
On 4/30/2024 6:48 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> writes:
>
>> On 4/29/2024 12:36 AM, Tamizh Chelvam Raja wrote:
>>
>>> From: Venkateswara Naralasetty <quic_vnaralas@quicinc.com>
>>>
>>> If STATUS_BUFFER_DONE is not set for a monitor status ring entry,
>>> we don't process the status ring until STATUS_BUFFER_DONE set
>>> for that status ring entry.
>>>
>>> During LMAC reset it may happen that hardware will not write
>>> STATUS_BUFFER_DONE tlv in status buffer, in that case we end up
>>> waiting for STATUS_BUFFER_DONE leading to backpressure on monitor
>>> status ring.
>>>
>>> To fix the issue, when HP(Head Pointer) + 1 entry is peeked and if DMA
>>> is not done and if HP + 2 entry's DMA done is set,
>>> replenish HP + 1 entry and start processing in next interrupt.
>>> If HP + 2 entry's DMA done is not set, poll onto HP + 1 entry DMA
>>> done to be set.
>>>
>>> Also, during monitor attach HP points to the end of the ring and
>>> TP(Tail Pointer) points to the start of the ring.
>>> Using ath11k_hal_srng_src_peek() may result in processing invalid buffer
>>> for the very first interrupt. Since, HW starts writing buffer from TP.
>>>
>>> To avoid this issue call ath11k_hal_srng_src_next_peek() instead of
>>> calling ath11k_hal_srng_src_peek().
>>>
>>> Tested-on: IPQ5018 hw1.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.6.0.1-00861-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Venkateswara Naralasetty <quic_vnaralas@quicinc.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Tamizh Chelvam Raja <quic_tamizhr@quicinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tamizh Chelvam Raja <quic_tamizhr@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
>>
>> however note...
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* If done status is missing:
>>> + * 1. As per MAC team's suggestion,
>>> + * when HP + 1 entry is peeked and if DMA
>>> + * is not done and if HP + 2 entry's DMA done
>>> + * is set. skip HP + 1 entry and
>>> + * start processing in next interrupt.
>>> + * 2. If HP + 2 entry's DMA done is not set,
>>> + * poll onto HP + 1 entry DMA done to be set.
>>> + * Check status for same buffer for next time
>>> + * dp_rx_mon_status_srng_process
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + reap_status = ath11k_dp_rx_mon_handle_status_buf_done(ab, srng,
>>> + rx_ring);
>>
>> ath11k-check reports:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c:3116: line length of 95 exceeds 90 columns
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c:3117: line length of 95 exceeds 90 columns
>
> Tamizh, please ALWAYS run ath11k-check. We are wasting time for trivial
> stuff like this.
>
>> Kalle, in this case we may want to make an exception since I don't think there
>> is a clean way to fix this other than refactoring.
>
> The new function name looked quite long so I shortened it to
> ath11k_dp_rx_mon_buf_done() and the warning is now gone. Does that look
> reasonable name?
>
> Also I removed one unrelated change and removed unnecessary else. Please
> check my changes:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=6e88d559268779107715008c51e006f7a5f62045
So looking at the 'pending' change I have the observation that
ath11k_dp_rx_mon_buf_done() only returns one of two values:
DP_MON_STATUS_NO_DMA
DP_MON_STATUS_REPLINISH
And the return value handling has explicit handling for those values, without
any logic for other values:
+ if (reap_status == DP_MON_STATUS_NO_DMA)
+ continue;
+
+ if (reap_status == DP_MON_STATUS_REPLINISH) {
if we only expect these two values to ever be returned, then we could remove
the testing for DP_MON_STATUS_REPLINISH since, it it isn't NO_DMA then it must
be REPLINISH
Also after this patch is merged, can we have a spelling correcting patch:
s/REPLINISH/REPLENISH/
+ ath11k_warn(ab, "mon status DONE not set %lx, buf_id %d\n",
+ FIELD_GET(HAL_TLV_HDR_TAG, tlv->tl),
+ buf_id);
I don't think we should log anything here. we already warn before calling the
new function. if we get here it means the next buffer had DONE set so we can
replenish the current buffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 7:36 [PATCHv5] wifi: ath11k: skip status ring entry processing Tamizh Chelvam Raja
2024-04-29 18:12 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-04-30 13:48 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-30 14:44 ` Tamizh Chelvam Raja
2024-04-30 15:14 ` Jeff Johnson [this message]
2024-05-03 13:11 ` Kalle Valo
2024-05-03 14:55 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-05-07 10:00 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f9abe89-a004-45e8-b369-5c2b39bff440@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_tamizhr@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_vnaralas@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).