Linux-XFS Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Storing bdev request_queue limits in xfs_buftarg
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:46:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <881d7dfc-c11a-4d19-9c2e-4bf8d9f607dd@oracle.com> (raw)

This is a question regarding the atomic writes work, and whether it is 
proper to store atomic write-related bdev request_queue limits in 
xfs_buftarg, as already discussed in 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/6430d813-cb30-4a66-94e1-ea89bdc921da@oracle.com/ 
(and also in the v2 series).

I can't get a conclusion, so I am sending a separate mail.

A suggestion is to store atomic_write_unit_{min, max} in xfs_buftarg, 
like we do for bdev logical block size. But the concern is "geometry of
the device can change underneath", see 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20231003161029.GG21298@frogsfrogsfrogs/#t 
(so do not do it).

We only need those limits in XFS for statx reporting of 
atomic_write_unit_{min, max}, as in that series the block layer will 
reject out-of-limit atomic writes.

If those limits did change after mount, then the worst that happens is 
that we report incorrect atomic_write_unit_{min, max} values and the 
user may have IOs rejected unexpectedly.

I assume that we would not normally consider adding other bdev 
request_queue limits to xfs_buftarg, and we rely on the block layer to 
handle all sizes of BIOs submitted.

Please advise.

John

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-03-21 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=881d7dfc-c11a-4d19-9c2e-4bf8d9f607dd@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).