Linux-XFS Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, chandan.babu@oracle.com, hare@suse.de,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:23:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EE249FE8-2FE9-4BB0-B27A-6202F93B6C12@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <muprk3zff7dsn3futp3by3t6bxuy5m62rpylmrp77ss3kay24k@wx4fn7uw7y6r>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6733 bytes --]

On 26 Mar 2024, at 12:10, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:06:04PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:02:49PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
>>> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> As we don't have a way to split a folio to a any given lower folio
>>> order yet, avoid splitting the folio in split_huge_page_to_list() if it
>>> has a minimum folio order requirement.
>>
>> FYI, Zi Yan's patch to do that is now in Andrew's tree.
>> c010d47f107f609b9f4d6a103b6dfc53889049e9 in current linux-next (dated
>> Feb 26)
>
> Yes, I started playing with the patches but I am getting a race condition
> resulting in a null-ptr-deref for which I don't have a good answer for
> yet.
>
> @zi yan Did you encounter any issue like this when you were testing?
>
> I did the following change (just a prototype) instead of this patch:
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 9859aa4f7553..63ee7b6ed03d 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3041,6 +3041,10 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>  {
>         struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
>         struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
> +       unsigned int mapping_min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);

I am not sure if this is right. Since folio can be anonymous and folio->mapping
does not point to struct address_space.

> +
> +       if (!folio_test_anon(folio))
> +               new_order = max_t(unsigned int, mapping_min_order, new_order);
>         /* reset xarray order to new order after split */
>         XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index, new_order);
>         struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> @@ -3117,6 +3121,8 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>                         goto out;
>                 }
>
> +               // XXX: Remove it later
> +               VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO((new_order < mapping_min_order), folio);
>                 gfp = current_gfp_context(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) &
>                                                         GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
>
> I am getting a random null-ptr deref when I run generic/176 multiple
> times with different blksizes. I still don't have a minimal reproducer
> for this issue. Race condition during writeback:
>
> filemap_get_folios_tag+0x171/0x5c0:
> arch_atomic_read at arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:23
> (inlined by) raw_atomic_read at include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h:457
> (inlined by) raw_atomic_fetch_add_unless at include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h:2426
> (inlined by) raw_atomic_add_unless at include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h:2456
> (inlined by) atomic_add_unless at include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1518
> (inlined by) page_ref_add_unless at include/linux/page_ref.h:238
> (inlined by) folio_ref_add_unless at include/linux/page_ref.h:247
> (inlined by) folio_ref_try_add_rcu at include/linux/page_ref.h:280
> (inlined by) folio_try_get_rcu at include/linux/page_ref.h:313
> (inlined by) find_get_entry at mm/filemap.c:1984
> (inlined by) filemap_get_folios_tag at mm/filemap.c:2222
>
>
>
> [  537.863105] ==================================================================
> [  537.863968] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in filemap_get_folios_tag+0x171/0x5c0
> [  537.864581] Write of size 4 at addr 0000000000000036 by task kworker/u32:5/366
> [  537.865123]
> [  537.865293] CPU: 6 PID: 366 Comm: kworker/u32:5 Not tainted 6.8.0-11739-g7d0c6e7b5a7d-dirty #795
> [  537.867201] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> [  537.868444] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-254:32)
> [  537.869055] Call Trace:
> [  537.869341]  <TASK>
> [  537.869569]  dump_stack_lvl+0x4f/0x70
> [  537.869938]  kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0
> [  537.870293]  ? filemap_get_folios_tag+0x171/0x5c0
> [  537.870767]  ? filemap_get_folios_tag+0x171/0x5c0
> [  537.871578]  kasan_check_range+0x101/0x1b0
> [  537.871893]  filemap_get_folios_tag+0x171/0x5c0
> [  537.872269]  ? __pfx_filemap_get_folios_tag+0x10/0x10
> [  537.872857]  ? __pfx___submit_bio+0x10/0x10
> [  537.873326]  ? mlock_drain_local+0x234/0x3f0
> [  537.873938]  writeback_iter+0x59a/0xe00
> [  537.874477]  ? __pfx_iomap_do_writepage+0x10/0x10
> [  537.874969]  write_cache_pages+0x7f/0x100
> [  537.875396]  ? __pfx_write_cache_pages+0x10/0x10
> [  537.875892]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x270
> [  537.876345]  ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
> [  537.876804]  iomap_writepages+0x88/0xf0
> [  537.877186]  xfs_vm_writepages+0x120/0x190
> [  537.877705]  ? __pfx_xfs_vm_writepages+0x10/0x10
> [  537.878161]  ? lock_release+0x36f/0x670
> [  537.878521]  ? __wb_calc_thresh+0xe5/0x3b0
> [  537.878892]  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
> [  537.879308]  do_writepages+0x170/0x7a0
> [  537.879676]  ? __pfx_do_writepages+0x10/0x10
> [  537.880182]  ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x312/0xe40
> [  537.880689]  ? reacquire_held_locks+0x1f1/0x4a0
> [  537.881193]  ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x312/0xe40
> [  537.881665]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110
> [  537.882104]  ? lock_release+0x36f/0x670
> [  537.883344]  ? wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode+0x3b8/0x710
> [  537.883853]  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
> [  537.884229]  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
> [  537.884604]  ? lock_acquire+0x138/0x2f0
> [  537.884952]  __writeback_single_inode+0xd4/0xa60
> [  537.885369]  writeback_sb_inodes+0x4cf/0xe40
> [  537.885760]  ? __pfx_writeback_sb_inodes+0x10/0x10
> [  537.886208]  ? __pfx_move_expired_inodes+0x10/0x10
> [  537.886640]  __writeback_inodes_wb+0xb4/0x200
> [  537.887037]  wb_writeback+0x55b/0x7c0
> [  537.887372]  ? __pfx_wb_writeback+0x10/0x10
> [  537.887750]  ? lock_acquire+0x138/0x2f0
> [  537.888094]  ? __pfx_register_lock_class+0x10/0x10
> [  537.888521]  wb_workfn+0x648/0xbb0
> [  537.888835]  ? __pfx_wb_workfn+0x10/0x10
> [  537.889192]  ? lock_acquire+0x128/0x2f0
> [  537.889539]  ? lock_acquire+0x138/0x2f0
> [  537.889890]  process_one_work+0x7ff/0x1710
> [  537.890272]  ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
> [  537.890685]  ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240
> [  537.891026]  worker_thread+0x6e8/0x12b0
> [  537.891381]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [  537.891768]  kthread+0x2ad/0x380
> [  537.892064]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [  537.892403]  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
> [  537.892728]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [  537.893068]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [  537.893434]  </TASK>


--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-13 17:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm: Support order-1 folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 18:29   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26  8:44     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-15 13:21   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 18:41   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26  8:56     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-26  9:39     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26  9:44       ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 10:00         ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 10:06           ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 10:55             ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 13:41               ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-26 15:11     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 13:08     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-04-22 11:03     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] readahead: round up file_ra_state->ra_pages to mapping_min_nrpages Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:06   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 16:10     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-26 16:23       ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-03-26 16:33         ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 16:38           ` Zi Yan
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:15   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26  9:53     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26  9:53   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 15:06     ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 14:54   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EE249FE8-2FE9-4BB0-B27A-6202F93B6C12@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).