From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:55:26 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgiKTmYU8349lK7l@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329041426.GA18850@lst.de>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:14:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> FYI, I've picked up your comments with minor edits for the commit
> message, let me know if that is ok with you:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/hch/xfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=445d786ae6e50f6631118e0fa378ad0cd72076a9
Yes, that's fine. It certainly can't hurt having some of the
historic context of the code in new commits as it avoids the need
for archive spelunking to make sense of the change...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-30 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:08 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:27 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:42 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:39 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgiKTmYU8349lK7l@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).