LinuxPPC-Dev Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	nathan@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
	naveen@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	maddy@linux.ibm.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, mingo@kernel.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, mahesh@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] objtool/powerpc: Enhance objtool to fixup alternate feature relative addresses
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:49:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250929104946.GG3289052@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250929080456.26538-2-sv@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 01:34:54PM +0530, Sathvika Vasireddy wrote:
> Implement build-time fixup of alternate feature relative addresses for
> the out-of-line (else) patch code. Initial posting to achieve the same
> using another tool can be found at [1]. Idea is to implement this using
> objtool instead of introducing another tool since it already has elf
> parsing and processing covered.
> 
> Introduce --ftr-fixup as an option to objtool to do feature fixup at
> build-time.
> 
> Couple of issues and warnings encountered while implementing feature
> fixup using objtool are as follows:
> 
> 1. libelf is creating corrupted vmlinux file after writing necessary
> changes to the file. Due to this, kexec is not able to load new
> kernel.
> 
> It gives the following error:
>         ELF Note corrupted !
>         Cannot determine the file type of vmlinux
> 
> To fix this issue, after opening vmlinux file, make a call to
> elf_flagelf (e, ELF_C_SET, ELF_F_LAYOUT). This instructs libelf not
> to touch the segment and section layout. It informs the library
> that the application will take responsibility for the layout of the
> file and that the library should not insert any padding between
> sections.
> 
> 2. Fix can't find starting instruction warnings when run on vmlinux
> 
> Objtool throws a lot of can't find starting instruction warnings
> when run on vmlinux with --ftr-fixup option.
> 
> These warnings are seen because find_insn() function looks for
> instructions at offsets that are relative to the start of the section.
> In case of individual object files (.o), there are no can't find
> starting instruction warnings seen because the actual offset
> associated with an instruction is itself a relative offset since the
> sections start at offset 0x0.
> 
> However, in case of vmlinux, find_insn() function fails to find
> instructions at the actual offset associated with an instruction
> since the sections in vmlinux do not start at offset 0x0. Due to
> this, find_insn() will look for absolute offset and not the relative
> offset. This is resulting in a lot of can't find starting instruction
> warnings when objtool is run on vmlinux.
> 
> To fix this, pass offset that is relative to the start of the section
> to find_insn().
> 
> find_insn() is also looking for symbols of size 0. But, objtool does
> not store empty STT_NOTYPE symbols in the rbtree. Due to this,
> for empty symbols, objtool is throwing can't find starting
> instruction warnings. Fix this by ignoring symbols that are of
> size 0 since objtool does not add them to the rbtree.
> 
> 3. Objtool is throwing unannotated intra-function call warnings
> when run on vmlinux with --ftr-fixup option.
> 
> One such example:
> 
> vmlinux: warning: objtool: .text+0x3d94:
>                         unannotated intra-function call
> 
> .text + 0x3d94 = c000000000008000 + 3d94 = c0000000000081d4
> 
> c0000000000081d4: 45 24 02 48  bl c00000000002a618
> <system_reset_exception+0x8>
> 
> c00000000002a610 <system_reset_exception>:
> c00000000002a610:       0e 01 4c 3c     addis   r2,r12,270
>                         c00000000002a610: R_PPC64_REL16_HA    .TOC.
> c00000000002a614:       f0 6c 42 38     addi    r2,r2,27888
>                         c00000000002a614: R_PPC64_REL16_LO    .TOC.+0x4
> c00000000002a618:       a6 02 08 7c     mflr    r0
> 
> This is happening because we should be looking for destination
> symbols that are at absolute offsets instead of relative offsets.
> After fixing dest_off to point to absolute offset, there are still
> a lot of these warnings shown.
> 
> In the above example, objtool is computing the destination
> offset to be c00000000002a618, which points to a completely
> different instruction. find_call_destination() is looking for this
> offset and failing. Instead, we should be looking for destination
> offset c00000000002a610 which points to system_reset_exception
> function.
> 
> Even after fixing the way destination offset is computed, and
> after looking for dest_off - 0x8 in cases where the original offset
> is not found, there are still a lot of unannotated intra-function
> call warnings generated. This is due to symbols that are not
> properly annotated.
> 
> So, for now, as a hack to curb these warnings, do not emit
> unannotated intra-function call warnings when objtool is run
> with --ftr-fixup option.

Should not all those fixes be split out into separate patches? Also,
Changelog seems to have lost the bit where you explain *why* you need
this. IIRC Nick's original tool had a description of why this is needed.

Also, please see:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9500b90c4182b03da59472e1a27876818610b084.1758067942.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/457c2e84b81bd6515aaa60ec8e9e0cc892ed7afa.1758067942.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org




  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-29 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-29  8:04 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] objtool: Fixup alternate feature relative addresses Sathvika Vasireddy
2025-09-29  8:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] objtool/powerpc: Enhance objtool to fixup " Sathvika Vasireddy
2025-09-29 10:49   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-29 16:59     ` Sathvika Vasireddy
2025-09-29  8:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] kbuild: Add objtool integration for PowerPC feature fixups Sathvika Vasireddy
2025-10-04 19:43   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-10-13  1:07     ` Sathvika Vasireddy
2025-09-29  8:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: Enable build-time feature fixup processing by default Sathvika Vasireddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250929104946.GG3289052@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=sv@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).