Live-Patching Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
	<live-patching@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Move error print out of lock protection in klp_enable_patch()
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:20:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5504552-dc31-2dc5-97a1-b08927900992@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902133628.GA29761@pathway.suse.cz>



On 2022/9/2 21:36, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2022-09-02 09:28:59, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
>>>> index 42f7e716d56bf72..cb7abc821a50584 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
>>>> @@ -1041,9 +1041,9 @@ int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
>>>>  	mutex_lock(&klp_mutex);
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (!klp_is_patch_compatible(patch)) {
>>>> +		mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
>>>>  		pr_err("Livepatch patch (%s) is not compatible with the already installed livepatches.\n",
>>>>  			patch->mod->name);
>>>> -		mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
>>>
>>> I do not see how this change could reliably reduce the code size.
>>>
>>> As Joe wrote, it looks like a random effect that is specific to a
>>> particular compiler version, compilation options, and architecture.
>>>
>>> I am against these kind of random microptimizations. It is just a call
>>> for problems. If you move printk() outside of a lock, you need to make
>>> sure that the information is not racy.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> 	mutex_lock(&klp_mutex);
>>         if (!klp_is_patch_compatible(patch)) {
>>                 mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
>> 			<--------- Do you mean the incompatible patches maybe disabled at this point?
> 
> This particular change is safe in the current design.
> klp_enable_patch() is called from the module_init() callback
> where patch->mod->name is defined. So it can't change.
> 
> The problem is that it is not obvious that it is safe. One has to
> think about it. Also it might become dangerous when someone
> tries to call klp_enable_livepatch() for another livepatch module.

OK, I got it, thanks.

> 
>>                 pr_err("Livepatch patch (%s) ...\n", patch->mod->name);
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>>
>>>
>>> It might be safe in this particular case. But it is a bad practice.
>>> It adds an extra work. It is error-prone with questionable gain.
>>>
>>> I am sorry but I NACK this patch. There must be better ways to
>>
>> OK
> 
> Thanks for understanding.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Petr
> .
> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei

      reply	other threads:[~2022-09-05  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01  2:27 [PATCH] livepatch: Move error print out of lock protection in klp_enable_patch() Zhen Lei
2022-09-01 13:24 ` Joe Lawrence
2022-09-01 13:45   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-01 14:18 ` Petr Mladek
2022-09-02  1:28   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-02 13:36     ` Petr Mladek
2022-09-05  1:20       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5504552-dc31-2dc5-97a1-b08927900992@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).