From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH ORPHANED] profiling: Remove create_prof_cpu_mask().
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:27:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0be742a5-bfe5-489b-8ceb-efd99306bdcd@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
create_prof_cpu_mask() is no longer used after commit 1f44a225777e ("s390:
convert interrupt handling to use generic hardirq").
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
Since nobody can respond, sending to Linus, as per "THE REST" rule
in MAINTAINERS file.
include/linux/profile.h | 5 -----
kernel/profile.c | 43 -----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/profile.h b/include/linux/profile.h
index 11db1ec516e2..04ae5ebcb637 100644
--- a/include/linux/profile.h
+++ b/include/linux/profile.h
@@ -18,13 +18,8 @@ struct proc_dir_entry;
struct notifier_block;
#if defined(CONFIG_PROFILING) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
-void create_prof_cpu_mask(void);
int create_proc_profile(void);
#else
-static inline void create_prof_cpu_mask(void)
-{
-}
-
static inline int create_proc_profile(void)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/profile.c b/kernel/profile.c
index 7575747e2ac6..1a6c1cf98485 100644
--- a/kernel/profile.c
+++ b/kernel/profile.c
@@ -342,49 +342,6 @@ void profile_tick(int type)
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-static int prof_cpu_mask_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
-{
- seq_printf(m, "%*pb\n", cpumask_pr_args(prof_cpu_mask));
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int prof_cpu_mask_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- return single_open(file, prof_cpu_mask_proc_show, NULL);
-}
-
-static ssize_t prof_cpu_mask_proc_write(struct file *file,
- const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
-{
- cpumask_var_t new_value;
- int err;
-
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&new_value, GFP_KERNEL))
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- err = cpumask_parse_user(buffer, count, new_value);
- if (!err) {
- cpumask_copy(prof_cpu_mask, new_value);
- err = count;
- }
- free_cpumask_var(new_value);
- return err;
-}
-
-static const struct proc_ops prof_cpu_mask_proc_ops = {
- .proc_open = prof_cpu_mask_proc_open,
- .proc_read = seq_read,
- .proc_lseek = seq_lseek,
- .proc_release = single_release,
- .proc_write = prof_cpu_mask_proc_write,
-};
-
-void create_prof_cpu_mask(void)
-{
- /* create /proc/irq/prof_cpu_mask */
- proc_create("irq/prof_cpu_mask", 0600, NULL, &prof_cpu_mask_proc_ops);
-}
-
/*
* This function accesses profiling information. The returned data is
* binary: the sampling step and the actual contents of the profile
--
2.18.4
reply other threads:[~2024-04-27 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0be742a5-bfe5-489b-8ceb-efd99306bdcd@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).