LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2016 20:17:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454375856-27757-1-git-send-email-jeyu@redhat.com> (raw)

As explained here [1], livepatch modules are failing to initialize properly
because the ftrace coming module notifier (which calls
ftrace_module_enable()) runs *after* the livepatch module notifier (which
enables the patch(es)). Thus livepatch attempts to apply patches to
modules before ftrace_module_enable() is even called for the corresponding
module(s). As a result, patch modules break. Ftrace code must run before
livepatch on module load, and the reverse is true on module unload.

For ftrace and livepatch, order of initialization (plus exit/cleanup code)
is important for loading and unloading modules, and using module notifiers
to perform this work is not ideal since it is not always clear what gets
called when. In this patchset, dependence on the module notifier call chain
is removed in favor of hard coding the corresponding function calls in the
module loader. This promotes better code visibility and ensures that ftrace
and livepatch code get called in the correct order on patch module load and
unload.

Tested the changes with a test livepatch module that patches 9p and nilfs2,
and verified that the issue described in [1] is fixed.

Patches are based on linux-next.

v1 can be found here -
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1454049827-3726-1-git-send-email-jeyu@redhat.com

v2:
- Instead of splitting the ftrace and livepatch notifiers into coming + going
  notifiers and adjusting their priorities, remove ftrace and livepatch notifiers
  completely and hard-code the necessary function calls in the module loader.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160128204033.GA32131@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com


Jessica Yu (2):
  ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier
  livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier

 include/linux/ftrace.h    |   6 +-
 include/linux/livepatch.h |   9 +++
 kernel/livepatch/core.c   | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 kernel/module.c           |  12 ++++
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c     |  36 +-----------
 5 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)

-- 
2.4.3

             reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-02  1:17 Jessica Yu [this message]
2016-02-02  1:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier Jessica Yu
2016-02-04 13:27   ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-04 14:18     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-04 15:21       ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-04 15:33         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-02  1:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch " Jessica Yu
2016-02-04 14:39   ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-04 14:56     ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-04 16:47     ` Miroslav Benes
2016-02-05  4:11     ` Jessica Yu
2016-02-05  9:15       ` Miroslav Benes
2016-02-05 10:06         ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-08  0:34       ` Rusty Russell
2016-02-04 17:29   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Miroslav Benes
2016-02-04 20:55   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-05  8:59     ` Miroslav Benes
2016-02-04 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload Jiri Kosina
2016-02-04 13:29   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-05  1:17     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454375856-27757-1-git-send-email-jeyu@redhat.com \
    --to=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).