From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751065AbcBEIdz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:33:55 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:36009 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750720AbcBEIdx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:33:53 -0500
Message-ID: <1454661229.3545.49.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:33:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20160205091146.d25db60f5c68229056aad82f@neosystem.cz>
References: <20160126093400.GV24938@quack.suse.cz>
	 <20160126111438.GA731@pathway.suse.cz>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601261352010.3886@nanos> <56B1C9E4.4020400@suse.cz>
	 <20160203122855.GB6762@dhcp22.suse.cz>
	 <20160203162441.GE14091@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1454518913.6148.15.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20160203170652.GI14091@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1454580263.3407.114.camel@gmail.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1602041130380.25254@nanos>
	 <20160204112044.GE4956@quack.suse.cz>
	 <20160204173931.4735a8de14fc0bde6c114321@neosystem.cz>
	 <1454640046.3545.8.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20160205091146.d25db60f5c68229056aad82f@neosystem.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 09:11 +0100, Daniel Bilik wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:40:46 +0100
> Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> wrote:

> > IMHO you should restore the CC list and re-post.  (If I were the
> > maintainer of either the workqueue code or 3.18-stable, I'd be highly
> > interested in this finding).
> 
> Sorry, I haven't realized tha patch proposed by Thomas is already on its
> way to stable. CC restored and re-posting.

I don't know where it's at, but where things stand is that it is
needed, but when combined with the patch which at least uncovered the
fact that it's needed, the two aren't playing well together according
to your test result.  Given both patches are already in kernels
upstream, and presumably Thomas's patch will eventually wander to
stable to fix them up, there might be some maintainer interest.

	-Mike