From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752116AbcCGGgx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:36:53 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:18188 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752025AbcCGGgn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:36:43 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,549,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="759355453" From: "Zheng, Lv" To: Chris Bainbridge CC: "Moore, Robert" , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPICA: Events: Execute some _REG methods in early boot Thread-Topic: [PATCH] ACPICA: Events: Execute some _REG methods in early boot Thread-Index: AQHRdvIIT8sXNGD5z0SZADX1IQUcpp9NgXog Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 06:36:05 +0000 Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BB608C0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20160227190828.GA4751@localhost> <1457190715-5851-1-git-send-email-chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1457190715-5851-1-git-send-email-chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMTgyZTI1YWItMzIwOS00NzcyLTlhMTgtNzJmYzdlZDNlYTMwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6InpJWDJyZWZLRmdGNEExdldnRFBsbCtFbVwvY0VPQXh2aGJycERFQ1pYcCtNPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, First of all, why don't you respond on the kernel bugzilla? Posting a fix here directly without communication doesn't look like a constructive help but more like a destructive attack to me. > From: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi- > Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Events: Execute some _REG methods in early boot > > The regression caused _REG methods to not be run in early boot for all > space IDs, but a removed comment stated that _REG methods should be > executed for IDs like embedded_controller. Before the regression this > was the case: > > [ 0.230469] Executing Method \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC._REG > [ 0.230531] Initializing Region \GNVS > [ 0.230607] Initializing Region \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC.ECOR > [ 0.231043] Initializing Region \_SB.PCI0.IGPU.IGDM [Lv Zheng] As I said in the previous reply, this is the known issue and can be fixed by applying the whole series. Especially this commit: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8241421/ That's why I asked you to test again by applying the whole series. And that's why after having not seen your response for so long time, we prepared a test branch and was waiting for your response. You need to post acpidump there to have the issue root caused so that more accurate fix can be generated. > > After the regression the initialisation is not done and ODEBUG warnings > are shown at boot and/or shutdown: > > [ 6.676570] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3317 at lib/debugobjects.c:263 > debug_print_object+0x85/0xa0() > [ 6.676576] ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type: > timer_list hint: stub_timer+0x0/0x20 > [ 6.676578] Modules linked in: > [ 6.676582] CPU: 0 PID: 3317 Comm: ccpd Not tainted 4.5.0-rc6 #509 > [ 6.676584] Hardware name: Apple Inc. MacBookPro10,2/Mac- > AFD8A9D944EA4843, BIOS MBP102.88Z.0106.B0A.1509130955 09/13/2015 > [ 6.676586] 0000000000000000 ffff880256543db0 ffffffff814802b5 > ffff880256543df8 > [ 6.676590] ffffffff81f40dbd ffff880256543de8 ffffffff810bd0ec > ffff880256543e90 > [ 6.676594] ffffffff822532c0 ffffffff81f40e63 ffffffff83138c88 > 0000000001fdf040 > [ 6.676598] Call Trace: > [ 6.676603] [] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 > [ 6.676608] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb0 > [ 6.676611] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50 > [ 6.676614] [] debug_print_object+0x85/0xa0 > [ 6.676616] [] ? cascade+0x70/0x70 > [ 6.676620] [] debug_object_assert_init+0xf8/0x130 > [ 6.676624] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > [ 6.676626] [] del_timer+0x1f/0x70 > [ 6.676631] [] laptop_sync_completion+0x61/0x100 > [ 6.676633] [] ? laptop_io_completion+0x30/0x30 > [ 6.676637] [] sys_sync+0x7f/0x90 > [ 6.676641] [] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f > > Fixes: efaed9be998b ("ACPICA: Events: Enhance acpi_ev_execute_reg_method() > to ensure no _REG evaluations can happen during OS early boot stages") > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/3/273 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 > Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge > --- > drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c > index 47092b4d633c..d0b02ef0effa 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evregion.c > @@ -590,6 +590,7 @@ acpi_ev_execute_reg_method(union > acpi_operand_object *region_obj, u32 function) > union acpi_operand_object *args[3]; > union acpi_operand_object *region_obj2; > acpi_status status; > + bool sp; > > ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ev_execute_reg_method); > > @@ -598,9 +599,28 @@ acpi_ev_execute_reg_method(union > acpi_operand_object *region_obj, u32 function) > return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST); > } > > + /* > + * For the default space_IDs, (the IDs for which there are default region > handlers > + * installed) Only execute the _REG methods if the global initialization > _REG > + * methods have already been run (via acpi_initialize_objects). In other > words, > + * we will defer the execution of the _REG methods for these > space_IDs until > + * execution of acpi_initialize_objects. This is done because we need > the handlers > + * for the default spaces (mem/io/pci/table) to be installed before we > can run > + * any control methods (or _REG methods). There is known BIOS code > that depends > + * on this. > + * > + * For all other space_IDs, we can safely execute the _REG methods > immediately. > + * This means that for IDs like embedded_controller, this function > should be called > + * only after acpi_enable_subsystem has been called. > + */ > + > + sp = (region_obj->region.space_id == > ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY || > + region_obj->region.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO || > + region_obj->region.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PCI_CONFIG || > + region_obj->region.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_DATA_TABLE); > if (region_obj2->extra.method_REG == NULL || > region_obj->region.handler == NULL || > - !acpi_gbl_reg_methods_enabled) { > + (sp && !acpi_gbl_reg_methods_enabled)) { > return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK); > } > [Lv Zheng] The above fix looks hackish to me. IMO, if you want to stop regressions that are triggered by this commit. A simpler and proper way would be to move acpi_gbl_reg_method_enabled = TRUE to the end of acpi_load_tables(). So that when the order of table loading and ECDT probing is corrected, the correct logic can still apply. I don't have ECDT platforms in hand to confirm. Can you help to just give it a try? Thanks and best regards -Lv > -- > 2.1.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html