From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932520Ab2BNVi1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:38:27 -0500 Received: from alternativer.internetendpunkt.de ([88.198.24.89]:49166 "EHLO geheimer.internetendpunkt.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932104Ab2BNViY (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:38:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:38:23 +0100 From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer To: Eric Dumazet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE support Message-ID: <20120214213823.GB6097@nuttenaction> References: <1329252484-6309-1-git-send-email-hagen@jauu.net> <1329253575.2555.16.camel@edumazet-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1329253575.2555.16.camel@edumazet-laptop> X-Key-Id: 98350C22 X-Key-Fingerprint: 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22 X-GPG-Key: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net 98350C22 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Eric Dumazet | 2012-02-14 22:06:15 [+0100]: >Seems pretty good to me. > >Do you have some performance numbers to share ? No, but I did some tests with one of my network performance tools. I imagine that I can *construct* test-cases and add some 'perf stat cs:u' statistics. IMHO it is not fair to present some artificial tunned performance numbers. There are use-cases where EPOLLEXCLUSIVE can be really helpfull, yes I think that this flag SHOULD be a userspace default. ;-) Hagen