From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752025AbcAXLd2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:33:28 -0500 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:45019 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbcAXLdX (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:33:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:33:18 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Sricharan Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, architt@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, ntelkar@codeaurora.org, galak@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, iivanov@mm-sol.com, agross@codeaurora.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] i2c: qup: Add support for v2 tags and bam dma Message-ID: <20160124113318.GB1775@katana> References: <1453197766-18976-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <000101d152a2$23bb1da0$6b3158e0$@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000101d152a2$23bb1da0$6b3158e0$@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Sricharan R (6): > > i2c: qup: Change qup_wait_writeready function to use for all timeouts > > i2c: qup: Add V2 tags support > > i2c: qup: Transfer each i2c_msg in i2c_msgs without a stop bit > > i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities > > dts: msm8974: Add blsp2_bam dma node > > dts: msm8974: Add dma channels for blsp2_i2c1 node > >=20 > Wolfram, Does the first 4 patches looks good to be picked up ? Except for patch 3 (I replied seperately), the rest looks okay to me. I wondered a little if it would make sense to make a new driver for v2 + DMA, because the additions were quite massive. But I'll leave it up to you if there is enough shared code between the two versions, so that a single driver will be better. --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWpLZ9AAoJEBQN5MwUoCm20/IQAKSFLox/xoAz33+OYp5woz/a bjQlyYoIhC03MTtVy6v7wDZkgxkhfYLxLMgh5hz6Dl8w50jbsPrv7842v67ZarVD 9mruQCq4hBH89ZyJjx2i5bOkEYexQMQp3LubKiVA3/YiW/Fih0sWzTWjkvPjMUCG wtMtWznWmg+6mImj4LRrPPQjlRQouDrX90IybBWG93egc82OmSxnFsWaxXQNCYvX FBIC5YienjipVGIbkGQVJcl8ac32q9on0xUmDIvnH/ElR64ks4z3FsdNy1KWjj81 HrDrR2F1TkDN4Zm71DNn7+xPxN3dHv8d14Pu+Kv1BPUdg7I7KyrQcNaFaGo9sXVE JB7X+NSyq362k2A05CkBiH5yJAwUHb5rDXz7jSRnM4DNQol0nAVLWaBZAKpzCGEU 933nS8u+XtMEBQnzq9uNQSKWSRM5TxP+nPWm5vCeoSX8hqZa7mbHZtfXxMmOHsdD y1bcCMN4/n2VrlLfZ4J+yRxbArlVbBYwDjhOX6SRpWfiFmOJkdouHyrEVEQSIxiz HppeD1dKDyAhlheKtYisVVtK6UIDbtqejfmbFgPdmBZBjbAa/a6zGW65QzzpHVys k0EKzUnjAZdPGtXjaopK2b8KPxck5OjhQO9y5O/vcOo9FDZMpHqVKoGXjsBC1GSm 2yLZNQj6w8sjTlV4+3ZC =/aeP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--