From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751829AbcBEDDA (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:03:00 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:34661 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796AbcBEDC6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:02:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:32:54 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Saravana Kannan Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/11] cpufreq: governor: Use common global_dbs_data pointer Message-ID: <20160205030254.GA21792@vireshk> References: <3705929.bslqXH980s@vostro.rjw.lan> <1876466.AY9fn15fDn@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160204053614.GV3469@vireshk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04-02-16, 17:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Consider a two policy system, who is stopping us from setting ondemand > > for one of them and conservative for the other one ? And so, we will > > have two gdbs_data .. > > I don't really regard that as an entirely sane thing to do, but you > have a point here. Why? Its quite useful IMO. For example on TC2, we have two clusters of A7 and A15. And we actually can configure A7 for interactive and A15 for ondemand. And this is very useful for performance/power metrics. -- viresh