From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751233AbcBEDYt (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:24:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:32851 "EHLO mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750723AbcBEDYr (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:24:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:54:44 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Saravana Kannan Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] cpufreq: governor: Use common mutex for dbs_data protection Message-ID: <20160205032444.GC21792@vireshk> References: <3705929.bslqXH980s@vostro.rjw.lan> <1529283.0IedZktI9q@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160204050954.GU3469@vireshk> <20160205025948.GE3068@vireshk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05-02-16, 04:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > And don't we switch governors under policy->rwsem anyway? So ? That is blocking only a single policy only, but with the new change, we will block all policies from doing that concurrently. -- viresh