From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754106AbcBEPEa (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:04:30 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0185.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.185]:60494 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752533AbcBEPE3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:04:29 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3622:3865:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:5007:6261:7514:7875:7903:9040:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13073:13311:13357:14659:21080:21324:30054:30070:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: alarm36_6122c86f97b01 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1477 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:04:26 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] trace_irqsoff: remove redundant reset per-CPU buff Message-ID: <20160205100426.72fa51b2@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <1445278226-16187-1-git-send-email-0x7f454c46@gmail.com> <20160204214045.1d6c2893@grimm.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:52:53 +0300 Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Steve! > Yeah, I know it may take time to get to unimportant patches > that are also mostly cleanups. > Also, FYI, even if you do an RFC, include "PATCH" in the brackets as well. I usually have "[RFC][PATCH]". Because when I'm looking for patches in my inbox, I will filter for PATCH. If a patch is out there without that in the subject, it is much more likely to be missed (and most likely will). -- Steve