From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753183AbcBJFst (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:48:49 -0500
Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:41218 "EHLO
	e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751739AbcBJFsr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:48:47 -0500
X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com
X-IBM-MailFrom: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:18:19 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/10] cpufreq: Clean up default and fallback governor
 setup
Message-ID: <20160210054819.GB31787@in.ibm.com>
Reply-To: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <3705929.bslqXH980s@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <9008098.QDD8C89zDx@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <7056089.34C11T15Ra@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20160210051514.GA31787@in.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160210051514.GA31787@in.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 16021005-0029-0000-0000-00001060F4B4
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:45:14AM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:11:54AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> > @@ -33,10 +33,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_performance(
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE_MODULE
> > -static
> > -#endif
> > -struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_performance = {
> > +static struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_performance = {
> >  	.name		= "performance",
> >  	.governor	= cpufreq_governor_performance,
> >  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> > @@ -52,6 +49,19 @@ static void __exit cpufreq_gov_performan
> >  	cpufreq_unregister_governor(&cpufreq_gov_performance);
> >  }
> > 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE
> > +struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_default_governor(void)
> > +{
> > +	return &cpufreq_gov_performance;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE_MODULE
> 
> Shouldn't this be #ifdef ?

Never mind! Shouldn't be reviewing patches first thing in the morning!

--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.