* [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option
@ 2021-03-29 13:05 Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats" Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-03-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rostedt, tglx, peterz, Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
The new option for function tracing aims to save space on the ring
buffer and to make it more readable in the case when a single function
is called number of times consecutively:
while (cond)
do_func();
Instead of having an identical records for each call of the function
we will record only the first call, followed by an event showing the
number of repeats.
v2 changes:
* As suggested by Steven in his review, we now record not only the
repetition count, but also the time elapsed between the last
repetition of the function and the actual generation of the
"func_repeats" event. 16 bits are used to record the repetition
count. In the case of an overflow of the counter a second pair of
"function" and "func_repeats" events will be generated. The time
interval gets codded by using up to 48 (32 + 16) bits.
Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) (5):
tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats"
tracing: Add "last_func_repeats" to struct trace_array
tracing: Add method for recording "func_repeats" events
tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options
tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing
kernel/trace/trace.c | 29 +++++
kernel/trace/trace.h | 25 ++++
kernel/trace/trace_entries.h | 28 +++++
kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 47 +++++++
5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats"
2021-03-29 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-03-29 13:05 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-04-05 21:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tracing: Add "last_func_repeats" to struct trace_array Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-03-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rostedt, tglx, peterz, Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
The event aims to consolidate the function tracing record in the cases
when a single function is called number of times consecutively.
while (cond)
do_func();
This may happen in various scenarios (busy waiting for example).
The new ftrace event can be used to show repeated function events with
a single event and save space on the ring buffer
Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.h | 3 +++
kernel/trace/trace_entries.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 5506424eae2a..6a5b4c2a0fa7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ enum trace_type {
TRACE_BPUTS,
TRACE_HWLAT,
TRACE_RAW_DATA,
+ TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
__TRACE_LAST_TYPE,
};
@@ -442,6 +443,8 @@ extern void __ftrace_bad_type(void);
TRACE_GRAPH_ENT); \
IF_ASSIGN(var, ent, struct ftrace_graph_ret_entry, \
TRACE_GRAPH_RET); \
+ IF_ASSIGN(var, ent, struct func_repeats_entry, \
+ TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS); \
__ftrace_bad_type(); \
} while (0)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
index 4547ac59da61..6f98c3b4e4fa 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
@@ -338,3 +338,42 @@ FTRACE_ENTRY(hwlat, hwlat_entry,
__entry->nmi_total_ts,
__entry->nmi_count)
);
+
+#define FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(entry) \
+(((u64)entry->top_delta_ts << 32) | entry->bottom_delta_ts) \
+
+#define FUNC_REPEATS_SET_DELTA_TS(entry, delta) \
+ do { \
+ if (likely(!((u64)delta >> 32))) { \
+ entry->bottom_delta_ts = delta; \
+ entry->top_delta_ts = 0; \
+ } else { \
+ if (likely(!((u64)delta >> 48))) { \
+ entry->bottom_delta_ts = delta & U32_MAX; \
+ entry->top_delta_ts = (delta >> 32); \
+ } else { \
+ /* Timestamp overflow. Set to max. */ \
+ entry->bottom_delta_ts = U32_MAX; \
+ entry->top_delta_ts = U16_MAX; \
+ } \
+ } \
+ } while (0); \
+
+FTRACE_ENTRY(func_repeats, func_repeats_entry,
+
+ TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
+
+ F_STRUCT(
+ __field( unsigned long, ip )
+ __field( unsigned long, parent_ip )
+ __field( u16 , count )
+ __field( u16 , top_delta_ts )
+ __field( u32 , bottom_delta_ts )
+ ),
+
+ F_printk(" %ps <-%ps\t(repeats:%u delta_ts: -%llu)",
+ (void *)__entry->ip,
+ (void *)__entry->parent_ip,
+ __entry->count,
+ FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(__entry))
+);
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
index a0146e1fffdf..55b08e146afc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -1373,6 +1373,52 @@ static struct trace_event trace_raw_data_event = {
.funcs = &trace_raw_data_funcs,
};
+static enum print_line_t
+trace_func_repeats_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags,
+ struct trace_event *event)
+{
+ struct func_repeats_entry *field;
+ struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
+
+ trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
+
+ trace_seq_printf(s, "%lu %lu %u %llu\n",
+ field->ip,
+ field->parent_ip,
+ field->count,
+ FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(field));
+
+ return trace_handle_return(s);
+}
+
+static enum print_line_t
+trace_func_repeats_print(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags,
+ struct trace_event *event)
+{
+ struct func_repeats_entry *field;
+ struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
+
+ trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
+
+ seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->ip, flags);
+ trace_seq_puts(s, " <-");
+ seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->parent_ip, flags);
+ trace_seq_printf(s, " (repeats: %u, delta_ts: -%llu)\n",
+ field->count,
+ FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(field));
+
+ return trace_handle_return(s);
+}
+
+static struct trace_event_functions trace_func_repeats_funcs = {
+ .trace = trace_func_repeats_print,
+ .raw = trace_func_repeats_raw,
+};
+
+static struct trace_event trace_func_repeats_event = {
+ .type = TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
+ .funcs = &trace_func_repeats_funcs,
+};
static struct trace_event *events[] __initdata = {
&trace_fn_event,
@@ -1385,6 +1431,7 @@ static struct trace_event *events[] __initdata = {
&trace_print_event,
&trace_hwlat_event,
&trace_raw_data_event,
+ &trace_func_repeats_event,
NULL
};
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/5] tracing: Add "last_func_repeats" to struct trace_array
2021-03-29 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats" Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-03-29 13:05 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tracing: Add method for recording "func_repeats" events Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-03-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rostedt, tglx, peterz, Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
The field is used to keep track of the consecutive (on the same CPU) calls
of a single function. This information is needed in order to consolidate
the function tracing record in the cases when a single function is called
number of times.
Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 1 +
kernel/trace/trace.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 3c605957bb5c..6fcc159c34a8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -9103,6 +9103,7 @@ static int __remove_instance(struct trace_array *tr)
ftrace_clear_pids(tr);
ftrace_destroy_function_files(tr);
tracefs_remove(tr->dir);
+ free_percpu(tr->last_func_repeats);
free_trace_buffers(tr);
for (i = 0; i < tr->nr_topts; i++) {
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 6a5b4c2a0fa7..1cd4da7ba769 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -262,6 +262,17 @@ struct cond_snapshot {
cond_update_fn_t update;
};
+/*
+ * struct trace_func_repeats - used to keep track of the consecutive
+ * (on the same CPU) calls of a single function.
+ */
+struct trace_func_repeats {
+ unsigned long ip;
+ unsigned long parent_ip;
+ unsigned long count;
+ u64 ts_last_call;
+};
+
/*
* The trace array - an array of per-CPU trace arrays. This is the
* highest level data structure that individual tracers deal with.
@@ -358,8 +369,15 @@ struct trace_array {
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT
struct cond_snapshot *cond_snapshot;
#endif
+ struct trace_func_repeats __percpu *last_func_repeats;
};
+static inline struct trace_func_repeats __percpu *
+tracer_alloc_func_repeats(struct trace_array *tr)
+{
+ return tr->last_func_repeats = alloc_percpu(struct trace_func_repeats);
+}
+
enum {
TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL = (1 << 0)
};
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/5] tracing: Add method for recording "func_repeats" events
2021-03-29 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats" Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tracing: Add "last_func_repeats" to struct trace_array Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-03-29 13:05 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-03-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rostedt, tglx, peterz, Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
This patch only provides the implementation of the method.
Later we will used it in a combination with a new option for
function tracing.
Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/trace/trace.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 6fcc159c34a8..0d3d14112f50 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3116,6 +3116,32 @@ static void ftrace_trace_userstack(struct trace_array *tr,
#endif /* CONFIG_STACKTRACE */
+void trace_last_func_repeats(struct trace_array *tr,
+ struct trace_func_repeats *last_info,
+ unsigned int trace_ctx)
+{
+ struct trace_buffer *buffer = tr->array_buffer.buffer;
+ struct func_repeats_entry *entry;
+ struct ring_buffer_event *event;
+ u64 delta;
+
+ event = __trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
+ sizeof(*entry), trace_ctx);
+ if (!event)
+ return;
+
+ delta = ring_buffer_event_time_stamp(buffer, event) -
+ last_info->ts_last_call;
+
+ entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
+ entry->ip = last_info->ip;
+ entry->parent_ip = last_info->parent_ip;
+ entry->count = last_info->count;
+ FUNC_REPEATS_SET_DELTA_TS(entry, delta)
+
+ __buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
+}
+
/* created for use with alloc_percpu */
struct trace_buffer_struct {
int nesting;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 1cd4da7ba769..e1f34119c036 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -701,6 +701,10 @@ static inline void __trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned int trace_ctx,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_STACKTRACE */
+void trace_last_func_repeats(struct trace_array *tr,
+ struct trace_func_repeats *last_info,
+ unsigned int trace_ctx);
+
extern u64 ftrace_now(int cpu);
extern void trace_find_cmdline(int pid, char comm[]);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options
2021-03-29 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tracing: Add method for recording "func_repeats" events Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-03-29 13:05 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-04-05 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-03-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rostedt, tglx, peterz, Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
Currently the logic for dealing with the options for function tracing
has two different implementations. One is used when we set the flags
(in "static int func_set_flag()") and another used when we initialize
the tracer (in "static int function_trace_init()"). Those two
implementations are meant to do essentially the same thing and they
are both not very convenient for adding new options. In this patch
we add a helper function that provides a single implementation of
the logic for dealing with the options and we make it such that new
options can be easily added.
Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
index f93723ca66bc..6c912eb0508a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
@@ -27,13 +27,17 @@ function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
static void
function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
+static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val);
static struct tracer_flags func_flags;
/* Our option */
enum {
+ TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS = 0x0, /* No flags set. */
TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK = 0x1,
};
+#define TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK (TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK)
+
int ftrace_allocate_ftrace_ops(struct trace_array *tr)
{
struct ftrace_ops *ops;
@@ -97,12 +101,9 @@ static int function_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
if (!tr->ops)
return -ENOMEM;
- /* Currently only the global instance can do stack tracing */
- if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL &&
- func_flags.val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK)
- func = function_stack_trace_call;
- else
- func = function_trace_call;
+ func = select_trace_function(func_flags.val);
+ if (!func)
+ return -EINVAL;
ftrace_init_array_ops(tr, func);
@@ -205,6 +206,18 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val)
+{
+ switch (flags_val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK) {
+ case TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS:
+ return function_trace_call;
+ case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK:
+ return function_stack_trace_call;
+ default:
+ return NULL;
+ }
+}
+
static struct tracer_opt func_opts[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
{ TRACER_OPT(func_stack_trace, TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK) },
@@ -213,7 +226,7 @@ static struct tracer_opt func_opts[] = {
};
static struct tracer_flags func_flags = {
- .val = 0, /* By default: all flags disabled */
+ .val = TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS, /* By default: all flags disabled */
.opts = func_opts
};
@@ -235,30 +248,31 @@ static struct tracer function_trace;
static int
func_set_flag(struct trace_array *tr, u32 old_flags, u32 bit, int set)
{
- switch (bit) {
- case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK:
- /* do nothing if already set */
- if (!!set == !!(func_flags.val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK))
- break;
+ ftrace_func_t func;
+ u32 new_flags_val;
- /* We can change this flag when not running. */
- if (tr->current_trace != &function_trace)
- break;
+ /* Do nothing if already set. */
+ if (!!set == !!(func_flags.val & bit))
+ return 0;
- unregister_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
+ /* We can change this flag only when not running. */
+ if (tr->current_trace != &function_trace)
+ return 0;
- if (set) {
- tr->ops->func = function_stack_trace_call;
- register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
- } else {
- tr->ops->func = function_trace_call;
- register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
- }
+ new_flags_val = (func_flags.val & ~(1UL << (bit - 1)));
+ new_flags_val |= (set << (bit - 1));
- break;
- default:
+ func = select_trace_function(new_flags_val);
+ if (!func)
return -EINVAL;
- }
+
+ /* Check if there's anything to change. */
+ if (tr->ops->func == func)
+ return 0;
+
+ unregister_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
+ tr->ops->func = func;
+ register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 5/5] tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing
2021-03-29 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-03-29 13:05 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-04-05 22:25 ` Steven Rostedt
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-03-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rostedt, tglx, peterz, Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
If the option is activated the function tracing record gets
consolidated in the cases when a single function is called number
of times consecutively. Instead of having an identical record for
each call of the function we will record only the first call
following by event showing the number of repeats.
Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
fix last
---
kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
index 6c912eb0508a..72d2e07dc103 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
@@ -27,16 +27,28 @@ function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
static void
function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
+static void
+function_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+ struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
+static void
+function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+ struct ftrace_ops *op,
+ struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val);
static struct tracer_flags func_flags;
/* Our option */
enum {
- TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS = 0x0, /* No flags set. */
- TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK = 0x1,
+
+ TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS = 0x0, /* No flags set. */
+ TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK = 0x1,
+ TRACE_FUNC_OPT_NO_REPEATS = 0x2,
+
+ /* Update this to next highest bit. */
+ TRACE_FUNC_OPT_HIGHEST_BIT = 0x4
};
-#define TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK (TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK)
+#define TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK (TRACE_FUNC_OPT_HIGHEST_BIT - 1)
int ftrace_allocate_ftrace_ops(struct trace_array *tr)
{
@@ -90,6 +102,17 @@ void ftrace_destroy_function_files(struct trace_array *tr)
ftrace_free_ftrace_ops(tr);
}
+static bool handle_func_repeats(struct trace_array *tr, u32 flags_val)
+{
+ if (!tr->last_func_repeats &&
+ (flags_val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_NO_REPEATS)) {
+ if (!tracer_alloc_func_repeats(tr))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int function_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
{
ftrace_func_t func;
@@ -105,6 +128,9 @@ static int function_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
if (!func)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (!handle_func_repeats(tr, func_flags.val))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
ftrace_init_array_ops(tr, func);
tr->array_buffer.cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
@@ -206,6 +232,127 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+static inline bool is_repeat_check(struct trace_array *tr,
+ struct trace_func_repeats *last_info,
+ unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
+{
+ if (last_info->ip == ip &&
+ last_info->parent_ip == parent_ip &&
+ last_info->count < U16_MAX) {
+ last_info->ts_last_call =
+ ring_buffer_time_stamp(tr->array_buffer.buffer);
+ last_info->count++;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline void process_repeats(struct trace_array *tr,
+ unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+ struct trace_func_repeats *last_info,
+ unsigned int trace_ctx)
+{
+ if (last_info->count) {
+ trace_last_func_repeats(tr, last_info, trace_ctx);
+ last_info->count = 0;
+ }
+
+ last_info->ip = ip;
+ last_info->parent_ip = parent_ip;
+}
+
+static void
+function_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+ struct ftrace_ops *op,
+ struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
+{
+ struct trace_func_repeats *last_info;
+ struct trace_array *tr = op->private;
+ struct trace_array_cpu *data;
+ unsigned int trace_ctx;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int bit;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (unlikely(!tr->function_enabled))
+ return;
+
+ bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
+ if (bit < 0)
+ return;
+
+ preempt_disable_notrace();
+
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->array_buffer.data, cpu);
+ if (atomic_read(&data->disabled))
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * An interrupt may happen at any place here. But as far as I can see,
+ * the only damage that this can cause is to mess up the repetition
+ * counter without valuable data being lost.
+ * TODO: think about a solution that is better than just hoping to be
+ * lucky.
+ */
+ last_info = per_cpu_ptr(tr->last_func_repeats, cpu);
+ if (is_repeat_check(tr, last_info, ip, parent_ip))
+ goto out;
+
+ local_save_flags(flags);
+ trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags);
+ process_repeats(tr, ip, parent_ip, last_info, trace_ctx);
+
+ trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, trace_ctx);
+
+out:
+ ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
+ preempt_enable_notrace();
+}
+
+static void
+function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+ struct ftrace_ops *op,
+ struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
+{
+ struct trace_func_repeats *last_info;
+ struct trace_array *tr = op->private;
+ struct trace_array_cpu *data;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ long disabled;
+ int cpu;
+ unsigned int trace_ctx;
+
+ if (unlikely(!tr->function_enabled))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Need to use raw, since this must be called before the
+ * recursive protection is performed.
+ */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->array_buffer.data, cpu);
+ disabled = atomic_inc_return(&data->disabled);
+
+ if (likely(disabled == 1)) {
+ last_info = per_cpu_ptr(tr->last_func_repeats, cpu);
+ if (is_repeat_check(tr, last_info, ip, parent_ip))
+ goto out;
+
+ trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags);
+ process_repeats(tr, ip, parent_ip, last_info, trace_ctx);
+
+ trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, trace_ctx);
+ __trace_stack(tr, trace_ctx, STACK_SKIP);
+ }
+
+ out:
+ atomic_dec(&data->disabled);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val)
{
switch (flags_val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK) {
@@ -213,6 +360,10 @@ static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val)
return function_trace_call;
case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK:
return function_stack_trace_call;
+ case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_NO_REPEATS:
+ return function_no_repeats_trace_call;
+ case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK | TRACE_FUNC_OPT_NO_REPEATS:
+ return function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call;
default:
return NULL;
}
@@ -222,6 +373,7 @@ static struct tracer_opt func_opts[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
{ TRACER_OPT(func_stack_trace, TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK) },
#endif
+ { TRACER_OPT(func-no-repeats, TRACE_FUNC_OPT_NO_REPEATS) },
{ } /* Always set a last empty entry */
};
@@ -270,6 +422,9 @@ func_set_flag(struct trace_array *tr, u32 old_flags, u32 bit, int set)
if (tr->ops->func == func)
return 0;
+ if (!handle_func_repeats(tr, new_flags_val))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
unregister_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
tr->ops->func = func;
register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats"
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats" Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-04-05 21:28 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2021-04-05 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware); +Cc: linux-kernel, tglx, peterz
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:05:29 +0300
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com> wrote:
> The event aims to consolidate the function tracing record in the cases
> when a single function is called number of times consecutively.
>
> while (cond)
> do_func();
>
> This may happen in various scenarios (busy waiting for example).
> The new ftrace event can be used to show repeated function events with
> a single event and save space on the ring buffer
>
> Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 3 +++
> kernel/trace/trace_entries.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index 5506424eae2a..6a5b4c2a0fa7 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ enum trace_type {
> TRACE_BPUTS,
> TRACE_HWLAT,
> TRACE_RAW_DATA,
> + TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
>
> __TRACE_LAST_TYPE,
> };
> @@ -442,6 +443,8 @@ extern void __ftrace_bad_type(void);
> TRACE_GRAPH_ENT); \
> IF_ASSIGN(var, ent, struct ftrace_graph_ret_entry, \
> TRACE_GRAPH_RET); \
> + IF_ASSIGN(var, ent, struct func_repeats_entry, \
> + TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS); \
> __ftrace_bad_type(); \
> } while (0)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
> index 4547ac59da61..6f98c3b4e4fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
> @@ -338,3 +338,42 @@ FTRACE_ENTRY(hwlat, hwlat_entry,
> __entry->nmi_total_ts,
> __entry->nmi_count)
> );
> +
> +#define FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(entry) \
> +(((u64)entry->top_delta_ts << 32) | entry->bottom_delta_ts) \
> +
> +#define FUNC_REPEATS_SET_DELTA_TS(entry, delta) \
Hmm, this isn't used anywhere. Why is it defined here?
> + do { \
> + if (likely(!((u64)delta >> 32))) { \
If statements are more expensive than shifts and masks, thus, this first if
statement isn't needed. Because:
entry->bottom_delta_ts = delta & U32_MAX;
entry->top_delta_ts = (delta >> 32);
Would produce the same faster as this conditional, but be generally faster.
> + entry->bottom_delta_ts = delta; \
> + entry->top_delta_ts = 0; \
> + } else { \
> + if (likely(!((u64)delta >> 48))) { \
> + entry->bottom_delta_ts = delta & U32_MAX; \
> + entry->top_delta_ts = (delta >> 32); \
> + } else { \
> + /* Timestamp overflow. Set to max. */ \
> + entry->bottom_delta_ts = U32_MAX; \
> + entry->top_delta_ts = U16_MAX; \
I'm almost thinking we should just ignore this as it should never happen,
because 2^48 nanoseconds is 78 hours. If we are repeating the same function
over and over again for over 78 hours, we have more issues to worry about
;-)
-- Steve
> + } \
> + } \
> + } while (0); \
> +
> +FTRACE_ENTRY(func_repeats, func_repeats_entry,
> +
> + TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
> +
> + F_STRUCT(
> + __field( unsigned long, ip )
> + __field( unsigned long, parent_ip )
> + __field( u16 , count )
> + __field( u16 , top_delta_ts )
> + __field( u32 , bottom_delta_ts )
> + ),
> +
> + F_printk(" %ps <-%ps\t(repeats:%u delta_ts: -%llu)",
> + (void *)__entry->ip,
> + (void *)__entry->parent_ip,
> + __entry->count,
> + FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(__entry))
> +);
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> index a0146e1fffdf..55b08e146afc 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,52 @@ static struct trace_event trace_raw_data_event = {
> .funcs = &trace_raw_data_funcs,
> };
>
> +static enum print_line_t
> +trace_func_repeats_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags,
> + struct trace_event *event)
> +{
> + struct func_repeats_entry *field;
> + struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
> +
> + trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
> +
> + trace_seq_printf(s, "%lu %lu %u %llu\n",
> + field->ip,
> + field->parent_ip,
> + field->count,
> + FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(field));
> +
> + return trace_handle_return(s);
> +}
> +
> +static enum print_line_t
> +trace_func_repeats_print(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags,
> + struct trace_event *event)
> +{
> + struct func_repeats_entry *field;
> + struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
> +
> + trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
> +
> + seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->ip, flags);
> + trace_seq_puts(s, " <-");
> + seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->parent_ip, flags);
> + trace_seq_printf(s, " (repeats: %u, delta_ts: -%llu)\n",
> + field->count,
> + FUNC_REPEATS_GET_DELTA_TS(field));
> +
> + return trace_handle_return(s);
> +}
> +
> +static struct trace_event_functions trace_func_repeats_funcs = {
> + .trace = trace_func_repeats_print,
> + .raw = trace_func_repeats_raw,
> +};
> +
> +static struct trace_event trace_func_repeats_event = {
> + .type = TRACE_FUNC_REPEATS,
> + .funcs = &trace_func_repeats_funcs,
> +};
>
> static struct trace_event *events[] __initdata = {
> &trace_fn_event,
> @@ -1385,6 +1431,7 @@ static struct trace_event *events[] __initdata = {
> &trace_print_event,
> &trace_hwlat_event,
> &trace_raw_data_event,
> + &trace_func_repeats_event,
> NULL
> };
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-04-05 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-07 13:34 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2021-04-05 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware); +Cc: linux-kernel, tglx, peterz
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:05:32 +0300
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently the logic for dealing with the options for function tracing
> has two different implementations. One is used when we set the flags
> (in "static int func_set_flag()") and another used when we initialize
> the tracer (in "static int function_trace_init()"). Those two
> implementations are meant to do essentially the same thing and they
> are both not very convenient for adding new options. In this patch
> we add a helper function that provides a single implementation of
> the logic for dealing with the options and we make it such that new
> options can be easily added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> index f93723ca66bc..6c912eb0508a 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> @@ -27,13 +27,17 @@ function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> static void
> function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
> +static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val);
> static struct tracer_flags func_flags;
>
> /* Our option */
> enum {
> + TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS = 0x0, /* No flags set. */
> TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK = 0x1,
> };
>
> +#define TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK (TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK)
> +
> int ftrace_allocate_ftrace_ops(struct trace_array *tr)
> {
> struct ftrace_ops *ops;
> @@ -97,12 +101,9 @@ static int function_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
> if (!tr->ops)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* Currently only the global instance can do stack tracing */
> - if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL &&
> - func_flags.val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK)
> - func = function_stack_trace_call;
> - else
> - func = function_trace_call;
> + func = select_trace_function(func_flags.val);
> + if (!func)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> ftrace_init_array_ops(tr, func);
>
> @@ -205,6 +206,18 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> +static ftrace_func_t select_trace_function(u32 flags_val)
> +{
> + switch (flags_val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_MASK) {
> + case TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS:
> + return function_trace_call;
> + case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK:
> + return function_stack_trace_call;
> + default:
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +}
Is there a reason why you defined this function here and not before its
first use? When defining functions, I tend to try to define them before
their first use to not need to declare the static prototype above.
The reasons for doing the static prototype and using a static function is
usually because of #ifdef around the first use, and keeping the function
from being hidden by the #ifdef, or the static function already exists, and
then gets used in a function before it, where it's just easier to add the
static declaration than moving the function.
> +
> static struct tracer_opt func_opts[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> { TRACER_OPT(func_stack_trace, TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK) },
> @@ -213,7 +226,7 @@ static struct tracer_opt func_opts[] = {
> };
>
> static struct tracer_flags func_flags = {
> - .val = 0, /* By default: all flags disabled */
> + .val = TRACE_FUNC_NO_OPTS, /* By default: all flags disabled */
> .opts = func_opts
> };
>
> @@ -235,30 +248,31 @@ static struct tracer function_trace;
> static int
> func_set_flag(struct trace_array *tr, u32 old_flags, u32 bit, int set)
> {
> - switch (bit) {
> - case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK:
> - /* do nothing if already set */
> - if (!!set == !!(func_flags.val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK))
> - break;
> + ftrace_func_t func;
> + u32 new_flags_val;
Nit, but the variable should just be "new_flags", which is consistent with
old_flags. In the kernel we don't need to the variable names to be so
verbose.
>
> - /* We can change this flag when not running. */
> - if (tr->current_trace != &function_trace)
> - break;
> + /* Do nothing if already set. */
> + if (!!set == !!(func_flags.val & bit))
> + return 0;
>
> - unregister_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
> + /* We can change this flag only when not running. */
> + if (tr->current_trace != &function_trace)
> + return 0;
>
> - if (set) {
> - tr->ops->func = function_stack_trace_call;
> - register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
> - } else {
> - tr->ops->func = function_trace_call;
> - register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
> - }
> + new_flags_val = (func_flags.val & ~(1UL << (bit - 1)));
> + new_flags_val |= (set << (bit - 1));
bit is already the mask, no need to shift it, nor there's no reason for the
extra set of parenthesis. And the above can be done in one line.
new_flags = (func_flags.val & ~bit) | (set ? bit : 0);
-- Steve
>
> - break;
> - default:
> + func = select_trace_function(new_flags_val);
> + if (!func)
> return -EINVAL;
> - }
> +
> + /* Check if there's anything to change. */
> + if (tr->ops->func == func)
> + return 0;
> +
> + unregister_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
> + tr->ops->func = func;
> + register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
>
> return 0;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
@ 2021-04-05 22:25 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2021-04-05 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware); +Cc: linux-kernel, tglx, peterz
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:05:33 +0300
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the option is activated the function tracing record gets
> consolidated in the cases when a single function is called number
> of times consecutively. Instead of having an identical record for
> each call of the function we will record only the first call
> following by event showing the number of repeats.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) <y.karadz@gmail.com>
>
> fix last
You seem to have left the above extra text "fix last" in both versions.
But the rest of the patch looks fine.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options
2021-04-05 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2021-04-07 13:34 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) @ 2021-04-07 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: linux-kernel, tglx, peterz
Hi Steven,
Hi Steven,
On 6.04.21 г. 1:15, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> @@ -235,30 +248,31 @@ static struct tracer function_trace;
>> static int
>> func_set_flag(struct trace_array *tr, u32 old_flags, u32 bit, int set)
>> {
>> - switch (bit) {
>> - case TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK:
>> - /* do nothing if already set */
>> - if (!!set == !!(func_flags.val & TRACE_FUNC_OPT_STACK))
>> - break;
>> + ftrace_func_t func;
>> + u32 new_flags_val;
> Nit, but the variable should just be "new_flags", which is consistent with
> old_flags. In the kernel we don't need to the variable names to be so
> verbose.
>
>>
>> - /* We can change this flag when not running. */
>> - if (tr->current_trace != &function_trace)
>> - break;
>> + /* Do nothing if already set. */
>> + if (!!set == !!(func_flags.val & bit))
>> + return 0;
>>
>> - unregister_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
>> + /* We can change this flag only when not running. */
>> + if (tr->current_trace != &function_trace)
>> + return 0;
>>
>> - if (set) {
>> - tr->ops->func = function_stack_trace_call;
>> - register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
>> - } else {
>> - tr->ops->func = function_trace_call;
>> - register_ftrace_function(tr->ops);
>> - }
>> + new_flags_val = (func_flags.val & ~(1UL << (bit - 1)));
>> + new_flags_val |= (set << (bit - 1));
> bit is already the mask, no need to shift it, nor there's no reason for the
> extra set of parenthesis. And the above can be done in one line.
>
> new_flags = (func_flags.val & ~bit) | (set ? bit : 0);
>
OK, I totally misinterpreted the meaning of the "bit" argument of the
function. I did not realized it is a mask. I was thinking the argument
gives only the number of the bit that changes (like 5 for the 5-th bit
inside the mask).
Thanks!
Yordan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-07 13:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-29 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add "func_no_repete" tracing option Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tracing: Define new ftrace event "func_repeats" Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-04-05 21:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tracing: Add "last_func_repeats" to struct trace_array Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tracing: Add method for recording "func_repeats" events Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tracing: Unify the logic for function tracing options Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-04-05 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-07 13:34 ` Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tracing: Add "func_no_repeats" option for function tracing Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)
2021-04-05 22:25 ` Steven Rostedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).