From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BC7C7EE25 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235187AbjFLHoa (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 03:44:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235307AbjFLHoU (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 03:44:20 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9C4170B for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 00:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C601568AFE; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:47:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Juergen Gross Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marczykowski-G=F3recki?= , Stefano Stabellini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ben Skeggs , Karol Herbst , Lyude Paul , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: always initialize xen-swiotlb when xen-pcifront is enabling Message-ID: <20230612064738.GA19518@lst.de> References: <20230518134253.909623-1-hch@lst.de> <20230518134253.909623-3-hch@lst.de> <20230519040405.GA10818@lst.de> <20230607131257.GB19206@lst.de> <79b26dac-b507-1c05-b499-784ca6ee3db0@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79b26dac-b507-1c05-b499-784ca6ee3db0@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:38:28PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> guest started with e820_host=1 even if no PCI passthrough was planned. >>> But this should be rather rare (at least I hope so). >> >> So is this an ACK for the patch and can we go ahead with it? > > As long as above mentioned check of the E820 map is done, yes. > > If you want I can send a diff to be folded into your patch on Monday. Yes, that would be great!