From: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
To: netfs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org, zhujia.zj@bytedance.com,
jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
libaokun@huaweicloud.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] cachefiles: make on-demand read killable
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:39:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424033916.2748488-13-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424033916.2748488-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Replacing wait_for_completion() with wait_for_completion_killable() in
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req() allows us to kill processes that might
trigger a hunk_task if the daemon is abnormal.
But now only CACHEFILES_OP_READ is killable, because OP_CLOSE and OP_OPEN
is initiated from kworker context and the signal is prohibited in these
kworker.
Note that when the req in xas changes, i.e. xas_load(&xas) != req, it
means that a process will complete the current request soon, so wait
again for the request to be completed.
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
index 673e7ad52041..b766430f4abf 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -525,8 +525,25 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object,
goto out;
wake_up_all(&cache->daemon_pollwq);
- wait_for_completion(&req->done);
- ret = req->error;
+wait:
+ ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&req->done);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = req->error;
+ } else {
+ xas_reset(&xas);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ if (xas_load(&xas) == req) {
+ xas_store(&xas, NULL);
+ ret = -EINTR;
+ }
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+
+ /* Someone will complete it soon. */
+ if (ret != -EINTR) {
+ cpu_relax();
+ goto wait;
+ }
+ }
cachefiles_req_put(req);
return ret;
out:
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 3:39 [PATCH 00/12] cachefiles: some bugfixes and cleanups for ondemand requests libaokun
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] cachefiles: remove request from xarry during flush requests libaokun
2024-04-25 3:13 ` Jia Zhu
2024-05-06 3:48 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-06 3:57 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-06 5:50 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-07 6:52 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] cachefiles: remove err_put_fd tag in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read() libaokun
2024-04-25 3:17 ` Jia Zhu
2024-05-06 3:55 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-06 4:02 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() libaokun
2024-04-24 14:55 ` Jia Zhu
2024-04-25 1:33 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-25 3:39 ` Jia Zhu
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read() libaokun
2024-04-25 3:42 ` [External] " Jia Zhu
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] cachefiles: add output string to cachefiles_obj_[get|put]_ondemand_fd libaokun
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 06/12] cachefiles: add consistency check for copen/cread libaokun
2024-05-06 2:31 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-06 3:12 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info libaokun
2024-05-06 2:55 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-06 3:23 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] cachefiles: never get a new anon fd if ondemand_id is valid libaokun
2024-05-06 3:09 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-07 9:32 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds libaokun
2024-05-06 3:24 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-06 3:34 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] cachefiles: Set object to close if ondemand_id < 0 in copen libaokun
2024-04-25 4:56 ` Jia Zhu
2024-04-24 3:39 ` [PATCH 11/12] cachefiles: flush all requests after setting CACHEFILES_DEAD libaokun
2024-04-24 3:39 ` libaokun [this message]
2024-04-25 5:15 ` [PATCH 12/12] cachefiles: make on-demand read killable Jia Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424033916.2748488-13-libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--to=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhujia.zj@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).