From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7472913C3F7; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713930516; cv=none; b=kMIJUvLlk9wl/h92Uy3tICp9KXjNm6evqikveG4ySzsG7sE7kpJoGw7bCI5OdsMDm4ReVaW6GBYqHwPJ7NYbX+vbczhheg/dHg0YXXFWujvPQn+v4h79ZBL+0t3QSKGsV1EQWZfh9fx5bsdsWSoc0M2RAgxDRuv88b50dve5GI4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713930516; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BO6iju7BIdyHla7JdyTPZnRi9252nvOjBCma1/KwZFs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=QpdYgaeehDNtFmZ3L9I7jbY1ZRDh3VStILNV3RQcSIF8Z6O6SOf48KBZNeOfuAB19nY0TEqfU4vVE55ezwvxSykiAC+vg+TzA3YlxZrXF1yjDa2KZlzd6rh5w61C8SPrpjc6/3kilW+s4430xzZdQEbpIedq3BVqIxKimgWElbM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VPQ1y1gCPz4f3m6Z; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:48:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C16A1A0E09; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:48:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgCXaBELgShmKXE4Kw--.6143S7; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:48:31 +0800 (CST) From: libaokun@huaweicloud.com To: netfs@lists.linux.dev Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org, zhujia.zj@bytedance.com, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libaokun@huaweicloud.com, Baokun Li , Hou Tao Subject: [PATCH 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:39:07 +0800 Message-Id: <20240424033916.2748488-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240424033916.2748488-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240424033916.2748488-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:cCh0CgCXaBELgShmKXE4Kw--.6143S7 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW3JFWrur1kZw45Gr1DurWrAFb_yoWxWFW7pF ZIyFyxtry8WFW8CrZ7AF15Jr1rJ3ykAFnrWr10q3s3Arn0vr1rZr1UtF1rZFy5CryvkrsF qw48uF9rJ34qv3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUQY14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWUWVWUuwAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_JrWl82xGYIkIc2 x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0 Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJw A2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS 0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUXVWUAwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0 Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2 xKxwAKzVCY07xG64k0F24lc7CjxVAKzI0EY4vE52x082I5MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC2 0s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI 0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE 14v26r4j6ryUMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI 8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUjjjg7UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 5olet0hnxqqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ From: Baokun Li We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore command: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962 CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542 Call Trace: kasan_report+0x94/0xc0 cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0 vfs_read+0x169/0xb50 ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0 Allocated by task 626: __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690 cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30 cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140 cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230 [...] Freed by task 626: kfree+0xf1/0x2c0 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690 cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30 cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140 cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230 [...] ================================================================== Following is the process that triggers the issue: mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2 ------------------------------------------------------------ cachefiles_ondemand_init_object cachefiles_ondemand_send_req REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len) wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done) cachefiles_daemon_read cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n) process_open_req(REQ_A) ------ restore ------ cachefiles_ondemand_restore xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX) xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW); cachefiles_daemon_read cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size)); cachefiles_ondemand_copen xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id) complete(&REQ_A->done) kfree(REQ_A) cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A) fd = get_unused_fd_flags file = anon_inode_getfile fd_install(fd, file) load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data; load->fd = fd; // load UAF !!! This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then released when the waiting and reading is over. Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray. Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests") Suggested-by: Hou Tao Signed-off-by: Baokun Li --- fs/cachefiles/internal.h | 1 + fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h index d33169f0018b..7745b8abc3aa 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h +++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static inline bool cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(struct cachefiles_cache *cache) struct cachefiles_req { struct cachefiles_object *object; struct completion done; + refcount_t ref; int error; struct cachefiles_msg msg; }; diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c index fd49728d8bae..56d12fe4bf73 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c +++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ #include #include "internal.h" +static inline void cachefiles_req_put(struct cachefiles_req *req) +{ + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref)) + kfree(req); +} + static int cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { @@ -299,7 +305,6 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, { struct cachefiles_req *req; struct cachefiles_msg *msg; - unsigned long id = 0; size_t n; int ret = 0; XA_STATE(xas, &cache->reqs, cache->req_id_next); @@ -330,41 +335,39 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, xas_clear_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW); cache->req_id_next = xas.xa_index + 1; + refcount_inc(&req->ref); xa_unlock(&cache->reqs); - id = xas.xa_index; - if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN) { ret = cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(req); if (ret) { cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(req->object); - goto error; + goto out; } } - msg->msg_id = id; + msg->msg_id = xas.xa_index; msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id; if (copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n) != 0) { ret = -EFAULT; if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN) close_fd(((struct cachefiles_open *)msg->data)->fd); - goto error; } - - /* CLOSE request has no reply */ - if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) { - xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id); - complete(&req->done); +out: + /* Remove error request and CLOSE request has no reply */ + if (ret || msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) { + xas_reset(&xas); + xas_lock(&xas); + if (xas_load(&xas) == req) { + req->error = ret; + complete(&req->done); + xas_store(&xas, NULL); + } + xas_unlock(&xas); } - - return n; - -error: - xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id); - req->error = ret; - complete(&req->done); - return ret; + cachefiles_req_put(req); + return ret ? ret : n; } typedef int (*init_req_fn)(struct cachefiles_req *req, void *private); @@ -394,6 +397,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object, goto out; } + refcount_set(&req->ref, 1); req->object = object; init_completion(&req->done); req->msg.opcode = opcode; @@ -455,7 +459,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object, wake_up_all(&cache->daemon_pollwq); wait_for_completion(&req->done); ret = req->error; - kfree(req); + cachefiles_req_put(req); return ret; out: /* Reset the object to close state in error handling path. -- 2.39.2