LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, nm@ti.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kip Broadhurst <kbroadhurst@ti.com>,
	w.egorov@phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dp8386x: Add MIT license along with GPL-2.0
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:17:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240520-discard-fanatic-f8e686a4faad@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e56ea52-9e58-4291-8f7f-4721dd74c72f@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 986 bytes --]

On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 02:18:55PM +0530, Kumar, Udit wrote:
> Hi Conor
> 
> On 5/17/2024 8:11 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:12:26PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote:
> > > > Modify license to include dual licensing as GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
> > > > license for TI specific phy header files. This allows for Linux
> > > > kernel files to be used in other Operating System ecosystems
> > > > such as Zephyr or FreeBSD.
> > > What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, why not use that?
> > I cut myself off, I meant to say:
> > What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, the standard dual license for
> > bindings, why not use that?
> 
> want to be inline with License of top level DTS, which is including this
> header file

Unless there's a specific reason to use MIT (like your legal won't even
allow you to use BSD-2-Clause) then please just use the normal license
for bindings here.

Cheers,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-20 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-17 10:42 [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dp8386x: Add MIT license along with GPL-2.0 Udit Kumar
2024-05-17 13:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-17 14:17   ` Kumar, Udit
2024-05-17 14:39 ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-17 14:41   ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-18  8:48     ` Kumar, Udit
2024-05-20 17:17       ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-05-20 20:18         ` Rob Herring
2024-05-22  8:04           ` Paolo Abeni
2024-05-22 10:25             ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-22 13:40               ` Nishanth Menon
2024-05-22 15:37                 ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-22 17:39                 ` Kumar, Udit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240520-discard-fanatic-f8e686a4faad@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kbroadhurst@ti.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=w.egorov@phytec.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).