From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>,
qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: [PATCH, RFT] byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25937441.NbUvhTZ9vo@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427110503.GB24887@virgil.suse.cz>
This is another attempt to avoid a regression in wwn_to_u64()
after that started using get_unaligned_be64(), which in turn
ran into a bug on gcc-4.9 through 6.1.
As part of the problem is how __builtin_constant_p gets evaluated
on an argument passed by reference into an inline function, this
avoids the use of __builtin_constant_p() for all architectures
that set CONFIG_ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP. Most architectures do not
set ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING, which means they probably
do not suffer from the problem in the qla2xxx driver, but they
might still run into it elsewhere.
I have not been able to reproduce the original problem, so I don't
know if this patch solves it, but at least it leads to simpler
code doing the same thing, so at least there should be no downsides.
Please test.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/swab.h b/include/uapi/linux/swab.h
index 3f10e5317b46..de56fd54428d 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/swab.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/swab.h
@@ -45,9 +45,7 @@
static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __fswab16(__u16 val)
{
-#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__
- return __builtin_bswap16(val);
-#elif defined (__arch_swab16)
+#if defined (__arch_swab16)
return __arch_swab16(val);
#else
return ___constant_swab16(val);
@@ -56,9 +54,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __fswab16(__u16 val)
static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val)
{
-#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__
- return __builtin_bswap32(val);
-#elif defined(__arch_swab32)
+#if defined(__arch_swab32)
return __arch_swab32(val);
#else
return ___constant_swab32(val);
@@ -67,9 +63,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val)
static inline __attribute_const__ __u64 __fswab64(__u64 val)
{
-#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
- return __builtin_bswap64(val);
-#elif defined (__arch_swab64)
+#if defined (__arch_swab64)
return __arch_swab64(val);
#elif defined(__SWAB_64_THRU_32__)
__u32 h = val >> 32;
@@ -102,28 +96,40 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswahb32(__u32 val)
* __swab16 - return a byteswapped 16-bit value
* @x: value to byteswap
*/
+#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__
+#define __swab16(x) __builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
+#else
#define __swab16(x) \
(__builtin_constant_p((__u16)(x)) ? \
___constant_swab16(x) : \
__fswab16(x))
+#endif
/**
* __swab32 - return a byteswapped 32-bit value
* @x: value to byteswap
*/
+#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__
+#define __swab32(x) __builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
+#else
#define __swab32(x) \
(__builtin_constant_p((__u32)(x)) ? \
___constant_swab32(x) : \
__fswab32(x))
+#endif
/**
* __swab64 - return a byteswapped 64-bit value
* @x: value to byteswap
*/
+#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
+#define __swab64(x) __builtin_bswap64((__u64)(x))
+#else
#define __swab64(x) \
(__builtin_constant_p((__u64)(x)) ? \
___constant_swab64(x) : \
__fswab64(x))
+#endif
/**
* __swahw32 - return a word-swapped 32-bit value
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-04 19:45 [PATCH] asm-generic: force inlining of some atomic_long operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 3:36 ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 12:12 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-13 12:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 15:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 16:55 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-13 17:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 15:29 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-14 15:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 17:09 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-15 5:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-15 13:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-15 22:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-16 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-18 13:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-19 13:56 ` [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-22 23:17 ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-25 16:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-26 2:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 3:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-26 7:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 10:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 13:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 22:36 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-27 0:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-27 11:05 ` Martin Jambor
2016-04-27 21:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 14:58 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 15:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-27 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-04-27 22:11 ` [PATCH, RFT] byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-28 16:27 ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-16 7:42 ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 13:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of unaligned byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25937441.NbUvhTZ9vo@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjambor@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).