From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 16:24:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2710262.Af7Ngczbqf@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2998470.K7oslgfuja@vostro.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The struct policy_dbs_info objects representing per-policy governor
data are not accessible directly from the corresponding policy
objects. To access them, one has to get a pointer to the
struct cpu_dbs_info of policy->cpu and use the policy_dbs field of
that which isn't really straightforward.
To address that rearrange the governor data structures so the
governor_data pointer in struct cpufreq_policy will point to
struct policy_dbs_info (instead of struct dbs_data) and that will
contain a pointer to struct dbs_data.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c | 3 -
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 6 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 27 ++++++------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 18 ++++----
5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -85,7 +85,8 @@ static ssize_t show_##file_name##_gov_sy
static ssize_t show_##file_name##_gov_pol \
(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) \
{ \
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data; \
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data; \
struct _gov##_dbs_tuners *tuners = dbs_data->tuners; \
return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", tuners->file_name); \
}
@@ -101,8 +102,8 @@ static ssize_t store_##file_name##_gov_s
static ssize_t store_##file_name##_gov_pol \
(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf, size_t count) \
{ \
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \
- return store_##file_name(dbs_data, buf, count); \
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data; \
+ return store_##file_name(policy_dbs->dbs_data, buf, count); \
}
#define show_store_one(_gov, file_name) \
@@ -130,6 +131,13 @@ static void *get_cpu_dbs_info_s(int cpu)
* cs_*: Conservative governor
*/
+/* Governor demand based switching data (per-policy or global). */
+struct dbs_data {
+ unsigned int min_sampling_rate;
+ int usage_count;
+ void *tuners;
+};
+
/* Common to all CPUs of a policy */
struct policy_dbs_info {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -144,6 +152,8 @@ struct policy_dbs_info {
atomic_t skip_work;
struct irq_work irq_work;
struct work_struct work;
+ /* dbs_data may be shared between multiple policy objects */
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
};
static inline void gov_update_sample_delay(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs,
@@ -204,7 +214,6 @@ struct cs_dbs_tuners {
};
/* Common Governor data across policies */
-struct dbs_data;
struct dbs_governor {
struct cpufreq_governor gov;
@@ -236,13 +245,6 @@ static inline struct dbs_governor *dbs_g
return container_of(policy->governor, struct dbs_governor, gov);
}
-/* Governor Per policy data */
-struct dbs_data {
- unsigned int min_sampling_rate;
- int usage_count;
- void *tuners;
-};
-
/* Governor specific ops, will be passed to dbs_data->gov_ops */
struct od_ops {
void (*powersave_bias_init_cpu)(int cpu);
@@ -273,7 +275,8 @@ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min_go
static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min_gov_pol \
(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) \
{ \
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; \
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data; \
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data; \
return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dbs_data->min_sampling_rate); \
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy
{
int cpu = policy->cpu;
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
unsigned int sampling_rate;
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = cur_idle_time;
if (ignore_nice) {
+ struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
u64 cur_nice;
unsigned long cur_nice_jiffies;
@@ -291,8 +292,8 @@ static void set_sampling_rate(struct dbs
}
}
-static int alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- struct dbs_governor *gov)
+static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ struct dbs_governor *gov)
{
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
int j;
@@ -300,7 +301,7 @@ static int alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct
/* Allocate memory for the common information for policy->cpus */
policy_dbs = kzalloc(sizeof(*policy_dbs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!policy_dbs)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return NULL;
/* Set policy_dbs for all CPUs, online+offline */
for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus)
@@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ static int alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct
atomic_set(&policy_dbs->skip_work, 0);
init_irq_work(&policy_dbs->irq_work, dbs_irq_work);
INIT_WORK(&policy_dbs->work, dbs_work_handler);
- return 0;
+ return policy_dbs;
}
static void free_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct
{
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = gov->gdbs_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
unsigned int latency;
int ret;
@@ -339,26 +341,26 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct
if (policy->governor_data)
return -EBUSY;
- if (dbs_data) {
- if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy()))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- ret = alloc_policy_dbs_info(policy, gov);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ policy_dbs = alloc_policy_dbs_info(policy, gov);
+ if (!policy_dbs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ if (dbs_data) {
+ if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy())) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto free_policy_dbs_info;
+ }
dbs_data->usage_count++;
- policy->governor_data = dbs_data;
+ policy_dbs->dbs_data = dbs_data;
+ policy->governor_data = policy_dbs;
return 0;
}
dbs_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dbs_data), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!dbs_data)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ret = alloc_policy_dbs_info(policy, gov);
- if (ret)
- goto free_dbs_data;
+ if (!dbs_data) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto free_policy_dbs_info;
+ }
dbs_data->usage_count = 1;
@@ -380,7 +382,8 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct
if (!have_governor_per_policy())
gov->gdbs_data = dbs_data;
- policy->governor_data = dbs_data;
+ policy_dbs->dbs_data = dbs_data;
+ policy->governor_data = policy_dbs;
ret = sysfs_create_group(get_governor_parent_kobj(policy),
get_sysfs_attr(gov));
@@ -395,21 +398,21 @@ reset_gdbs_data:
if (!have_governor_per_policy())
gov->gdbs_data = NULL;
gov->exit(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
+ kfree(dbs_data);
+
free_policy_dbs_info:
free_policy_dbs_info(policy, gov);
-free_dbs_data:
- kfree(dbs_data);
return ret;
}
static int cpufreq_governor_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
/* State should be equivalent to INIT */
- if (!cdbs->policy_dbs || cdbs->policy_dbs->policy)
+ if (policy_dbs->policy)
return -EBUSY;
if (!--dbs_data->usage_count) {
@@ -434,17 +437,16 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_exit(struct
static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
unsigned int sampling_rate, ignore_nice, j, cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
int io_busy = 0;
if (!policy->cur)
return -EINVAL;
/* State should be equivalent to INIT */
- if (!policy_dbs || policy_dbs->policy)
+ if (policy_dbs->policy)
return -EBUSY;
if (gov->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
@@ -500,12 +502,10 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct
static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
- struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
/* State should be equivalent to START */
- if (!policy_dbs || !policy_dbs->policy)
+ if (!policy_dbs->policy)
return -EBUSY;
gov_cancel_work(policy_dbs);
@@ -516,12 +516,10 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct
static int cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
- struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
/* State should be equivalent to START */
- if (!policy_dbs || !policy_dbs->policy)
+ if (!policy_dbs->policy)
return -EBUSY;
mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static unsigned int generic_powersave_bi
unsigned int jiffies_total, jiffies_hi, jiffies_lo;
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
policy->cpu);
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
if (!dbs_info->freq_table) {
@@ -130,7 +131,8 @@ static void ondemand_powersave_bias_init
static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
if (od_tuners->powersave_bias)
@@ -151,8 +153,9 @@ static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpu
static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
{
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy_dbs->policy;
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = dbs_info->cdbs.policy_dbs;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = policy_dbs->policy;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
@@ -189,7 +192,8 @@ static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsign
static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, policy->cpu);
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
int delay = 0, sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
@@ -277,7 +281,7 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct
* policy will be governed by dbs_data, otherwise there can be
* multiple policies that are governed by the same dbs_data.
*/
- if (dbs_data == policy->governor_data) {
+ if (dbs_data == policy_dbs->dbs_data) {
mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
/*
* On 32-bit architectures this may race with the
@@ -586,7 +590,7 @@ static void od_set_powersave_bias(unsign
if (policy->governor != CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND)
continue;
- dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
od_tuners->powersave_bias = default_powersave_bias;
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ static unsigned int amd_powersave_bias_t
long d_actual, d_reference;
struct msr actual, reference;
struct cpu_data_t *data = &per_cpu(cpu_data, policy->cpu);
- struct dbs_data *od_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *od_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = od_data->tuners;
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *od_info =
dbs_governor_of(policy)->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(policy->cpu);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsign
{
struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy_dbs->policy;
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
/*
@@ -104,7 +105,8 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsign
static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
dbs_check_cpu(policy);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-07 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 23:12 [PATCH 0/11] cpufreq: governor: ondemand/conservative data structures rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:14 ` [PATCH 1/11] cpufreq: Clean up default and fallback governor setup Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 0:55 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 5:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/11] cpufreq: governor: Use common mutex for dbs_data protection Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 0:59 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 5:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 16:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 3:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 3:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 3:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 3:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 3:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 3:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 23:22 ` [PATCH 3/11] cpufreq: governor: Use common global_dbs_data pointer Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 1:11 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 1:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 1:40 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 5:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 1:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 5:36 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAHZ_5WxJSDtFyFdCc-D2=HSaPON=3rzUxpxPYsCyZvrV1Nv3qw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-04 8:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 11:31 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-02-04 11:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 16:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 3:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:29 ` [PATCH 4/11] cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data pointers around unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 1:37 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 5/11] cpufreq: governor: Put governor structure into common_dbs_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 1:57 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 6/11] cpufreq: governor: Rename some data types and variables Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:33 ` [PATCH 7/11] cpufreq: governor: Rework cpufreq_governor_dbs() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 2:03 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-03 23:35 ` [PATCH 8/11] cpufreq: governor: Drop the gov pointer from struct dbs_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:35 ` [PATCH 9/11] cpufreq: governor: Rename cpu_common_dbs_info to policy_dbs_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:38 ` [PATCH 11/11] cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 5:40 ` [PATCH 0/11] cpufreq: governor: ondemand/conservative data structures rework Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 17:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/10] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/10] cpufreq: Clean up default and fallback governor setup Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-10 5:15 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-02-10 5:48 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-02-05 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] cpufreq: governor: Use common mutex for dbs_data protection Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 22:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 9:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-07 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data pointers around unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 7:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] cpufreq: governor: Put governor structure into common_dbs_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 7:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] cpufreq: governor: Rename some data types and variables Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 7:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] cpufreq: governor: Rework cpufreq_governor_dbs() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 8:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop the gov pointer from struct dbs_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 8:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] cpufreq: governor: Rename cpu_common_dbs_info to policy_dbs_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 8:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 22:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-06 12:48 ` [PATCH v3 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 9:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 9:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-07 14:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 9:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-06 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 9:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-06 12:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/10] cpufreq: governor: ondemand/conservative data structures rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 15:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: governor: Data structure rearrangement Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor_limits() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 15:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-08 0:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 15:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-02-07 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: governor: Rearrange governor data structures Viresh Kumar
2016-02-07 15:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-07 15:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-07 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: governor: Symmetrize cpu_dbs_info initialization and cleanup Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-07 15:52 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2710262.Af7Ngczbqf@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).