From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933229AbbD1Irx (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:47:53 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58614 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933123AbbD1Irs (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:47:48 -0400 Message-ID: <553F4931.7030404@arm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:47:45 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" CC: Sudeep Holla , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM64: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support References: <1430134846-24320-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1430158296.2859.31.camel@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1430158296.2859.31.camel@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tixy, On 27/04/15 19:11, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 12:40 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch series adds support for: >> 1. SCPI(System Control and Power Interface) mailbox protocol >> driver. > > Is there a public document with the final protocol specification? > I have spotted an inconsistency between driver and a draft doc I have > but before commenting on things like that it would be good to have the > final version of the document instead. > Thanks for having a look at the driver. I am already chasing this up with the concerned team to check when will this be made public. IIUC you do have a non-confidential (preliminary)version of document. So you can comment on the inconsistency you have observed and I can check if it's issue with the code or the document. Regards, Sudeep