From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756543AbcBBQuY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:50:24 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:35887 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752581AbcBBQuX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:50:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] irqchip: sun4i: fix compilation outside of arch/arm To: Andre Przywara , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com References: <1454348370-3816-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1454348370-3816-2-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <56B0C768.3020805@gmail.com> <56B0CC29.4060703@arm.com> Cc: Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <56B0DE4B.3090604@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:50:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B0CC29.4060703@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/02/16 16:32, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/02/16 15:12, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> On 01/02/16 18:39, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> The Allwinner sunxi specific interrupt controller cannot be compiled >>> for any architecture except arm: >> >> s/arm/arm64 > > ??? > > As it stands it only compiles for arm, and not arm64, so "cannot be > compile for any architecture except arm" is the right thing to say, no? > > Or did I get confused by my own double negation? > No, it's just me who get confused. ;) Sorry for the noise.