From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932633AbcBIAjk (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:39:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:36012 "EHLO mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932452AbcBIAji (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:39:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list References: <3071836.JbNxX8hU6x@vostro.rjw.lan> <18671470.kF8gVcBlTg@vostro.rjw.lan> <6398636.DlBgLvxltE@vostro.rjw.lan> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Juri Lelli , Thomas Gleixner From: Steve Muckle X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56B93548.9090006@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:39:36 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6398636.DlBgLvxltE@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to > put this series into linux-next. > > There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for > bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on > this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so > there really isn't more time to wait. Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and really just got to look at this today. One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL task activity? thanks, Steve