From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pci: dra7xx: use pdata callbacks to perform reset
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:06:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BACC6E.3060908@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1602091932160.2906@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Wednesday 10 February 2016 01:06 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Suman
>
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> On 02/09/2016 02:49 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> On 02/07/2016 08:48 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul, what do you think is the best way forward to perform reset?
>>>>>
>>>>> Many of the IP blocks with PRM hardreset lines are processor IP blocks.
>>>>> Those often need special reset handling to ensure that WFI/HLT-like
>>>>> instructions are executed after reset. This special handling ensures that
>>>>> the IP blocks' bus initiator interfaces indicate that they are in standby
>>>>> to the PRCM - thus allowing power management for the rest of the chip to
>>>>> work correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that doesn't seem to be the case with PCIe - and maybe others -
>>>>> possibly some of the MMUs?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, the sequencing between clocks and resets would still be the same
>>>> for MMUs, so, adding the custom flags for MMUs is fine.
>>>
>>> I'm curious as to whether HWMOD_CUSTOM_HARDRESET is needed for the MMUs.
>>> We've stated that the main point of the custom hardreset code is to handle
>>> processors that need to be placed into WFI/HLT, but it doesn't seem like
>>> there would be an equivalent for MMUs. Thoughts?
>>
>> The current OMAP IOMMU code already leverages the pdata ops for
>> performing the resets, so not adding the flags would also require
>> additional changes in the driver.
>>
>> Also, the reset lines controlling the MMUs actually also manage the
>> reset for all the other sub-modules other than the processor cores
>> within the sub-systems. We have currently different issues (see [1] for
>> eg. around the IPU sub-system entering RET in between), so from a PM
>> point of view, we do prefer to place the MMUs also in reset when we are
>> runtime suspended.
>
> Should we reassert hardreset in _idle() for IP blocks that don't have
> HWMOD_CUSTOM_HARDRESET set on them? Would that allow us to use this
> mechanism for the uncore hardreset lines, or are there other quirks?
IIUC _idle() will be called on pm_runtime_put. That would mean we perform reset
on every suspend/resume cycle which is not desired. (suspend/resume support for
PCIe is not yet in mainline but once we have it runtime_put and runtime_get
will be invoked during suspend/resume cycle). Let me know if my understanding
is wrong.
Thanks
Kishon
>
> Also - would that address the potential issue that you mentioned with the
> PCIe block, or is that a different issue?
>
>
> - Paul
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-10 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 14:11 [PATCH v3 0/3] dra7xx: get pcie working in mainline Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: DRA7: hwmod: Add reset data for PCIe Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-08 1:50 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-01-14 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: DRA7: add pdata-quirks to do reset of PCIe Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-15 19:19 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-15 19:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-15 19:41 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-18 9:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-01-27 17:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-14 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] pci: dra7xx: use pdata callbacks to perform reset Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-27 17:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-27 18:16 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-27 18:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-27 23:16 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-28 18:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-28 21:15 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-02 10:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-05 4:19 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-08 2:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-08 20:56 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-09 8:49 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-09 17:40 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-09 19:36 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-10 1:42 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-10 5:38 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-11 19:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-11 22:04 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-12 6:49 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-12 17:20 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-18 14:21 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-02-18 17:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-18 18:27 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-22 6:18 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-22 6:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-22 9:55 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-23 11:57 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-23 18:28 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-02-24 6:21 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-03-01 8:25 ` Paul Walmsley
2016-03-01 11:55 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-03-01 14:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-01 16:55 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-11 20:43 ` Suman Anna
2016-02-12 6:55 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-02-10 5:36 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BACC6E.3060908@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).