From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
skannan@codeaurora.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mturquette@baylibre.com, steve.muckle@linaro.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:32:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e84719b5475f79602e95af524e66e8927a85bc9.1454507872.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1454507872.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1454507872.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The offline routine was separated into two halves earlier by
'commit 1aee40ac9c86 ("cpufreq: Invoke __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
after releasing cpu_hotplug.lock");.
And the reasons cited were, race issues between accessing policy's sysfs
files and policy kobject's cleanup.
That race isn't valid anymore, as we don't remove the policy & its
kobject completely on hotplugs, but do that from ->remove() callback of
subsys framework.
These two routines can be merged back now.
This is a preparatory step for the next patch, that will enforce
policy->rwsem lock around __cpufreq_governor() routines STOP/EXIT
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 5f7e24567e0e..dc43294e7b31 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1309,9 +1309,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
return ret;
}
-static void cpufreq_offline_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
+static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ int ret;
pr_debug("%s: unregistering CPU %u\n", __func__, cpu);
@@ -1322,7 +1323,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
}
if (has_target()) {
- int ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1345,34 +1346,23 @@ static void cpufreq_offline_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
/* Start governor again for active policy */
if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
if (has_target()) {
- int ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
}
- } else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu) {
- cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
- }
-}
-static void cpufreq_offline_finish(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
-
- if (!policy) {
- pr_debug("%s: No cpu_data found\n", __func__);
return;
}
- /* Only proceed for inactive policies */
- if (!policy_is_inactive(policy))
- return;
+ if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
+ cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (has_target()) {
- int ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1401,10 +1391,8 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
if (!policy)
return;
- if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
- cpufreq_offline_prepare(cpu);
- cpufreq_offline_finish(cpu);
- }
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus);
remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu);
@@ -2255,11 +2243,7 @@ static int cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
- cpufreq_offline_prepare(cpu);
- break;
-
- case CPU_POST_DEAD:
- cpufreq_offline_finish(cpu);
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
--
2.7.0.79.gdc08a19
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 14:02 [PATCH V2 0/7] cpufreq: governors: Fix ABBA lockups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] cpufreq: governor: Treat min_sampling_rate as a governor-specific tunable Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 2:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] cpufreq: governor: New sysfs show/store callbacks for governor tunables Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 16:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused macros for creating governor tunable attributes Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] Revert "cpufreq: Drop rwsem lock around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT" Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-03 20:21 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 1:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 6:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 15:54 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] cpufreq: governors: Fix ABBA lockups Juri Lelli
2016-02-03 16:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 17:20 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-03 17:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:31 ` Shilpa Bhat
2016-02-03 23:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04 5:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 11:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 17:43 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 17:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 2:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05 3:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05 9:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-08 2:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-06 2:22 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-08 2:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-09 21:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 12:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 20:50 ` Shilpasri G Bhat
2016-02-05 2:49 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e84719b5475f79602e95af524e66e8927a85bc9.1454507872.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).