From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 02:00:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68e64a35-9705-6565-3b5c-5de38419aba8@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <z5imqaxyumc5pyk4ijumjby4tswfmnjsnedeekonx5tymhwsfi@h5dk3pl2zawf>
On 16.06.2023 19:54, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>> On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
>>>> but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
>>>> the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
>>>> of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.
>>>>
>>>> Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
>>>> A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
>>>> of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
>>>> the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).
>>>>
>>>> This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
>>>> as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
>>>> layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
>>>> and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
[...]
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + goto err_bulk_clk;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> +err_bulk_clk:
>>>
>>> Goto jump directly to another block looks odd to me. Why do you need this label
>>> anyway?
>> If clk_bulk_prepare_enable() fails, trying to proceed will hang the
>> platform with unclocked accesses. We need to unwind everything that
>> has been done up until that point, in reverse order.
>
> I missed this response from you earlier.
>
> But you are checking for 'ret' twice here. You will end up here even
> if you don't jump! So "if (ret) goto err_bulk_clk;" looks
> unnecessary.
>
> -Akhil.
Ohhh right, silly mistake on my part ;)
I already sent out a v9 since.. Please check it out and if you
have any further comments, I'll fix this, and if not.. Perhaps I
could fix it in an incremental patch if that revision is gtg?
Konrad
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
>>>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
>>>> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
>>>> + }
>>>> +err_set_opp:
>>>
>>> Generally, it is better to name the label based on what you do here. For
>>> eg: "unlock_lock:".
>> That seems to be a mixed bag all throughout the kernel, I've seen many
>> usages of err_(what went wrong)
>>
>>>
>>> Also, this function is small enough that it is better to return directly
>>> in case of error. I think that would be more readable.
>> Not really, adding the necessary cleanup steps in `if (ret)`
>> blocks would roughly double the function's size.
>>
>>>
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>> + msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>> {
>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>> @@ -1720,7 +1799,40 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>>>> +static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + trace_msm_gpu_suspend(0);
>>>> +
>>>> + msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>
>>> Again, is this initialized somewhere?
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Drain the outstanding traffic on memory buses */
>>>> + a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions(adreno_gpu, true);
>>>> +
>>>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>>>> +
>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->gxpd);
>>>> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->dev);
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo)
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++)
>>>> + a6xx_gpu->shadow[i] = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + gpu->suspend_count++;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>>>> {
>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>> @@ -1739,6 +1851,12 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>>>> +{
>>>> + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static struct msm_ringbuffer *a6xx_active_ring(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>> {
>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>> @@ -2004,8 +2122,8 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>>>> .set_param = adreno_set_param,
>>>> .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
>>>> .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
>>>> - .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
>>>> - .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
>>>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend,
>>>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_gmu_pm_resume,
>>>> .recover = a6xx_recover,
>>>> .submit = a6xx_submit,
>>>> .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
>>>> @@ -2020,6 +2138,35 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>>>> .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
>>>> .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
>>>> +#endif
>>>> + .create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
>>>> + .create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
>>>> + .get_rptr = a6xx_get_rptr,
>>>> + .progress = a6xx_progress,
>>>> + },
>>>> + .get_timestamp = a6xx_gmu_get_timestamp,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs_gmuwrapper = {
>>>> + .base = {
>>>> + .get_param = adreno_get_param,
>>>> + .set_param = adreno_set_param,
>>>> + .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
>>>> + .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
>>>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
>>>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
>>>> + .recover = a6xx_recover,
>>>> + .submit = a6xx_submit,
>>>> + .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
>>>> + .irq = a6xx_irq,
>>>> + .destroy = a6xx_destroy,
>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>>>> + .show = a6xx_show,
>>>> +#endif
>>>> + .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>>>> + .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
>>>> + .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
>>>> #endif
>>>> .create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
>>>> .create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
>>>> @@ -2050,15 +2197,31 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>
>>>> adreno_gpu->registers = NULL;
>>>>
>>>> + /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
>>>> + node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
>>>> + /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
>>>> + BUG_ON(!node);
>>>> +
>>>> + adreno_gpu->gmu_is_wrapper = of_device_is_compatible(node, "qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper");
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * We need to know the platform type before calling into adreno_gpu_init
>>>> * so that the hw_apriv flag can be correctly set. Snoop into the info
>>>> * and grab the revision number
>>>> */
>>>> info = adreno_info(config->rev);
>>>> -
>>>> - if (info && (info->revn == 650 || info->revn == 660 ||
>>>> - adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID), info->rev)))
>>>> + if (!info)
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Assign these early so that we can use the is_aXYZ helpers */
>>>> + /* Numeric revision IDs (e.g. 630) */
>>>> + adreno_gpu->revn = info->revn;
>>>> + /* New-style ADRENO_REV()-only */
>>>> + adreno_gpu->rev = info->rev;
>>>> + /* Quirk data */
>>>> + adreno_gpu->info = info;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu))
>>>> adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = true;
>>>>
>>>> a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
>>>> @@ -2069,7 +2232,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>> @@ -2082,13 +2248,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_7c3(adreno_gpu))
>>>> priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle = true;
>>>>
>>>> - /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
>>>> - node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
>>>> -
>>>> - /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
>>>> - BUG_ON(!node);
>>>> -
>>>> - ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>>>> of_node_put(node);
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>>>> index aa70390ee1c6..c788b06e72da 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>>>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
>>>> void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
>>>>
>>>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
>>>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
>>>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu);
>>>>
>>>> void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>>>> index 30ecdff363e7..4e5d650578c6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>>>> @@ -1041,16 +1041,18 @@ struct msm_gpu_state *a6xx_gpu_state_get(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>> /* Get the generic state from the adreno core */
>>>> adreno_gpu_state_get(gpu, &a6xx_state->base);
>>>>
>>>> - a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>> + a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>>
>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
>>>> /
>>>> - a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>> + a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> /* If GX isn't on the rest of the data isn't going to be accessible */
>>>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && !a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>>>> return &a6xx_state->base;
>>>>
>>>> /* Get the banks of indexed registers */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> index 6934cee07d42..5c5901d65950 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int adreno_load_fw(struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu)
>>>> if (!adreno_gpu->info->fw[i])
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> + /* Skip loading GMU firwmare with GMU Wrapper */
>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && i == ADRENO_FW_GMU)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Skip if the firmware has already been loaded */
>>>> if (adreno_gpu->fw[i])
>>>> continue;
>>>> @@ -1074,8 +1078,8 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> u32 speedbin;
>>>> int ret;
>>>>
>>>> - /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use */
>>>> - if (config->rev.core < 6) {
>>>> + /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use (or is absent). */
>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || config->rev.core < 6) {
>>>> /*
>>>> * This can only be done before devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(), or
>>>> * dev_pm_opp_set_config() will WARN_ON()
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>>> index f62612a5c70f..ee5352bc5329 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>>> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct adreno_gpu {
>>>> * code (a3xx_gpu.c) and stored in this common location.
>>>> */
>>>> const unsigned int *reg_offsets;
>>>> + bool gmu_is_wrapper;
>>>> };
>>>> #define to_adreno_gpu(x) container_of(x, struct adreno_gpu, base)
>>>>
>>>> @@ -145,6 +146,11 @@ struct adreno_platform_config {
>>>>
>>>> bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2);
>>>>
>>>> +static inline bool adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return gpu->gmu_is_wrapper;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static inline bool adreno_is_a2xx(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>> {
>>>> return (gpu->revn < 300);
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.40.1
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am still not fully onboard with the idea of gmu_wrapper node in devicetree.
>>> Aside from that, I don't see any other issue. Please check the few comments I left.
>> Thanks for your review!
>>
>> Konrad
>>>
>>> -Akhil.
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-17 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 13:52 [PATCH v8 00/18] GMU-less A6xx support (A610, A619_holi) Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 01/18] dt-bindings: display/msm: gpu: Document GMU wrapper-equipped A6xx Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-30 12:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-30 13:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-08 20:58 ` Rob Herring
2023-06-09 9:12 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-08 21:00 ` Rob Herring
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 02/18] dt-bindings: display/msm/gmu: Add GMU wrapper Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 03/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Remove static keyword from sptprac en/disable functions Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 04/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Move force keepalive vote removal to a6xx_gmu_force_off() Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-06 15:30 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 05/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Move a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions to a6xx_gpu Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-06 15:35 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 06/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Improve a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions() Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-06 17:09 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 07/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Add a helper for software-resetting the GPU Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-06 17:18 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-15 10:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-15 20:11 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-15 20:59 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-15 21:17 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 08/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Remove both GBIF and RBBM GBIF halt on hw init Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-09 18:25 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-09 18:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 09/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Extend and explain UBWC config Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-09 18:41 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-09 22:06 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-15 21:43 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-16 17:54 ` [Freedreno] " Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-17 0:00 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2023-06-17 16:07 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-19 13:10 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 11/18] drm/msm/adreno: Disable has_cached_coherent in GMU wrapper configurations Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-06 15:39 ` [Freedreno] " Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 12/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for A619_holi Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 13/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Add A610 support Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-14 19:41 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-15 10:02 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 14/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Fix some A619 tunables Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-14 19:44 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 15/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Use "else if" in GPU speedbin rev matching Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-14 19:46 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 16/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Use adreno_is_aXYZ macros in speedbin matching Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-14 19:50 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 17/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Add A619_holi speedbin support Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-14 20:15 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-05-29 13:52 ` [PATCH v8 18/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Add A610 " Konrad Dybcio
2023-06-14 20:18 ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-06-15 10:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-31 12:14 ` [PATCH v8 00/18] GMU-less A6xx support (A610, A619_holi) Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68e64a35-9705-6565-3b5c-5de38419aba8@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).