From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at net/sunrpc/svc.c:570 after updating from v5.15.153 to v5.15.155
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:05:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6F1A5E20-1A0E-479C-AD5B-886D10739702@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <141fbaa0-f8fa-4bfe-8c2d-7749fcf78ab3@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> On Apr 25, 2024, at 4:51 PM, Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
> On 25/04/24 11:37, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> On Apr 24, 2024, at 9:33 AM, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 24, 2024, at 3:42 AM, Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/04/24 13:38, Chris Packham wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/04/24 12:54, Chris Packham wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Jeff, Chuck, Greg,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After updating one of our builds along the 5.15.y LTS branch our
>>>>>>> testing caught a new kernel bug. Output below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't dug into it yet but wondered if it rang any bells.
>>>>>> A bit more info. This is happening at "reboot" for us. Our embedded
>>>>>> devices use a bit of a hacked up reboot process so that they come back
>>>>>> faster in the case of a failure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't happen with a proper `systemctl reboot` or with a SYSRQ+B
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can trigger it with `killall -9 nfsd` which I'm not sure is a
>>>>>> completely legit thing to do to kernel threads but it's probably close
>>>>>> to what our customized reboot does.
>>>>> I've bisected between v5.15.153 and v5.15.155 and identified commit
>>>>> dec6b8bcac73 ("nfsd: Simplify code around svc_exit_thread() call in
>>>>> nfsd()") as the first bad commit. Based on the context that seems to
>>>>> line up with my reproduction. I'm wondering if perhaps something got
>>>>> missed out of the stable track? Unfortunately I'm not able to run a more
>>>>> recent kernel with all of the nfs related setup that is being used on
>>>>> the system in question.
>>>> Thanks for bisecting, that would have been my first suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> The backport included all of the NFSD patches up to v6.2, but
>>>> there might be a missing server-side SunRPC patch.
>>> So dec6b8bcac73 ("nfsd: Simplify code around svc_exit_thread()
>>> call in nfsd()") is from v6.6, so it was applied to v5.15.y
>>> only to get a subsequent NFSD fix to apply.
>>>
>>> The immediately previous upstream commit is missing:
>>>
>>> 390390240145 ("nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.")
>>>
>>> For testing, I've applied this to my nfsd-5.15.y branch here:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git
>>>
>>> However even if that fixes the reported crash, this suggests
>>> that after v6.6, nfsd threads are not going to respond to
>>> "killall -9 nfsd".
>> I think this likely is the problem. The nfsd threads must be being
>> killed by a signal.
>> One only other cause for an nfsd thread to exit is if
>> svc_set_num_threads() is called, and all places that call that hold a
>> ref on the serv structure so the final put won't happen when the thread
>> exits.
>>
>> Before the patch that bisect found, the nfsd thread would exit with
>>
>> svc_get();
>> svc_exit_thread();
>> nfsd_put();
>>
>> This also holds a ref across the svc_exit_thread(), and ensures the
>> final 'put' happens from nfsD_put(), not svc_put() (in
>> svc_exit_thread()).
>>
>> Chris: what was the context when the crash happened? Could the nfsd
>> threads have been signalled? That hasn't been the standard way to stop
>> nfsd threads for a long time, so I'm a little surprised that it is
>> happening.
>
> We use a hacked up version of shutdown from util-linux and which does a
> `kill (-1, SIGTERM);` then `kill (-1, SIGKILL);` (I don't think that
> particular behaviour is the hackery). I'm not sure if -1 will pick up
> kernel threads but based on the symptoms it appears to be doing so (or
> maybe something else is in it's SIGTERM handler). I don't think we were
> ever really intending to send the signals to nfsd so whether it actually
> terminates or not I don't think is an issue for us. I can confirm that
> applying 390390240145 resolves the symptom we were seeing.
I'm 2/3 of the way through testing 5.15.156 with 390390240145
applied, so it would be just another day before I can send a
patch to stable@.
May I add Tested-by: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> ?
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 0:54 kernel BUG at net/sunrpc/svc.c:570 after updating from v5.15.153 to v5.15.155 Chris Packham
2024-04-24 1:38 ` Chris Packham
2024-04-24 7:42 ` Chris Packham
2024-04-24 13:33 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-04-24 14:03 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-04-24 23:37 ` NeilBrown
2024-04-25 20:51 ` Chris Packham
2024-04-25 21:05 ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2024-04-25 21:07 ` Chris Packham
2024-04-25 23:18 ` NeilBrown
2024-04-25 15:50 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6F1A5E20-1A0E-479C-AD5B-886D10739702@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).