LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <seanjc@google.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: handle !lapic_in_kernel case in kvm_cpu_*_extint
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:52:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74ddc2da-3698-aef9-b90f-5ca55c2b0031@amazon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127112114.3219360-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 11/27/20 12:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> Centralize handling of interrupts from the userspace APIC
> in kvm_cpu_has_extint and kvm_cpu_get_extint, since
> userspace APIC interrupts are handled more or less the
> same as ExtINTs are with split irqchip.  This removes
> duplicated code from kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr and
> kvm_cpu_has_interrupt, and makes the code more similar
> between kvm_cpu_has_{extint,interrupt} on one side
> and kvm_cpu_get_{extint,interrupt} on the other.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/irq.c   | 85 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>   arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c |  2 +-
>   2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
> index 99d118ffc67d..e2d49a506e7f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
> @@ -42,15 +42,27 @@ static int pending_userspace_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>    */
>   static int kvm_cpu_has_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>   {
> -       u8 accept = kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(v);
> +       /*
> +        * FIXME: interrupt.injected represents an interrupt that it's
> +        * side-effects have already been applied (e.g. bit from IRR
> +        * already moved to ISR). Therefore, it is incorrect to rely
> +        * on interrupt.injected to know if there is a pending
> +        * interrupt in the user-mode LAPIC.
> +        * This leads to nVMX/nSVM not be able to distinguish
> +        * if it should exit from L2 to L1 on EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT on
> +        * pending interrupt or should re-inject an injected
> +        * interrupt.
> +        */
> +       if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
> +               return v->arch.interrupt.injected;
> 
> -       if (accept) {
> -               if (irqchip_split(v->kvm))
> -                       return pending_userspace_extint(v);
> -               else
> -                       return v->kvm->arch.vpic->output;
> -       } else
> +       if (!kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(v))
>                  return 0;
> +
> +       if (irqchip_split(v->kvm))
> +               return pending_userspace_extint(v);
> +       else
> +               return v->kvm->arch.vpic->output;
>   }
> 
>   /*
> @@ -61,20 +73,6 @@ static int kvm_cpu_has_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>    */
>   int kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>   {
> -       /*
> -        * FIXME: interrupt.injected represents an interrupt that it's
> -        * side-effects have already been applied (e.g. bit from IRR
> -        * already moved to ISR). Therefore, it is incorrect to rely
> -        * on interrupt.injected to know if there is a pending
> -        * interrupt in the user-mode LAPIC.
> -        * This leads to nVMX/nSVM not be able to distinguish
> -        * if it should exit from L2 to L1 on EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT on
> -        * pending interrupt or should re-inject an injected
> -        * interrupt.
> -        */
> -       if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
> -               return v->arch.interrupt.injected;
> -
>          if (kvm_cpu_has_extint(v))
>                  return 1;
> 
> @@ -91,20 +89,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr);
>    */
>   int kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>   {
> -       /*
> -        * FIXME: interrupt.injected represents an interrupt that it's
> -        * side-effects have already been applied (e.g. bit from IRR
> -        * already moved to ISR). Therefore, it is incorrect to rely
> -        * on interrupt.injected to know if there is a pending
> -        * interrupt in the user-mode LAPIC.
> -        * This leads to nVMX/nSVM not be able to distinguish
> -        * if it should exit from L2 to L1 on EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT on
> -        * pending interrupt or should re-inject an injected
> -        * interrupt.
> -        */
> -       if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
> -               return v->arch.interrupt.injected;
> -
>          if (kvm_cpu_has_extint(v))
>                  return 1;
> 
> @@ -118,16 +102,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_cpu_has_interrupt);
>    */
>   static int kvm_cpu_get_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>   {
> -       if (kvm_cpu_has_extint(v)) {
> -               if (irqchip_split(v->kvm)) {
> -                       int vector = v->arch.pending_external_vector;
> -
> -                       v->arch.pending_external_vector = -1;
> -                       return vector;
> -               } else
> -                       return kvm_pic_read_irq(v->kvm); /* PIC */
> -       } else
> +       if (!kvm_cpu_has_extint(v)) {
> +               WARN_ON(!lapic_in_kernel(v));
>                  return -1;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
> +               return v->arch.interrupt.nr;
> +
> +       if (irqchip_split(v->kvm)) {
> +               int vector = v->arch.pending_external_vector;
> +
> +               v->arch.pending_external_vector = -1;
> +               return vector;
> +       } else
> +               return kvm_pic_read_irq(v->kvm); /* PIC */
>   }
> 
>   /*
> @@ -135,13 +124,7 @@ static int kvm_cpu_get_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>    */
>   int kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>   {
> -       int vector;
> -
> -       if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
> -               return v->arch.interrupt.nr;
> -
> -       vector = kvm_cpu_get_extint(v);
> -
> +       int vector = kvm_cpu_get_extint(v);
>          if (vector != -1)
>                  return vector;                  /* PIC */
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 105e7859d1f2..bb5ff761d5e2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -2465,7 +2465,7 @@ int kvm_apic_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>          struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>          u32 ppr;
> 
> -       if (!kvm_apic_hw_enabled(apic))
> +       if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
>                  return -1;
> 
>          __apic_update_ppr(apic, &ppr);
> --
> 2.28.0
> 
> 

Reviewed-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>



Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-27 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27 11:21 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: cleanup and fix userspace interrupt window Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-27 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: handle !lapic_in_kernel case in kvm_cpu_*_extint Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-27 11:56   ` David Woodhouse
2020-11-27 12:52   ` Filippo Sironi [this message]
2020-11-27 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Fix split-irqchip vs interrupt injection window request Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-27 12:53   ` Filippo Sironi
2021-04-09  7:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-12 21:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-13 11:03       ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-13 12:15         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-14  2:28           ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-14 16:58             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-15  0:59               ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-15  6:07                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-15  8:06                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-13 12:10       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-27 12:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: cleanup and fix userspace interrupt window David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74ddc2da-3698-aef9-b90f-5ca55c2b0031@amazon.de \
    --to=sironi@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).