From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C457433CD for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714295341; cv=none; b=J7JigrE/mvPflDKCEtLglXNQP3RvFuZ41EUQI9DGnkkj4Yybw27HBA/tE/ScQDEtBo0dGE8vz1lcYJB33Y9sW/f1R4bANJqQmXFvAgKmWjZ7xYIZykqETnWE0ciA2OfwHim+QmutupIN+mYlAYgF92Gl8AoVinmzYubmFcosN7s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714295341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2tP4WEZOMkIS1sLkWlghhXO5TyWe82hph+C/8aOfuWw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=LFYunOdZ+TFp4JHeUvbqVh8HfKaUM6dRyC3xcMdzI/zW69Ic5sMYFJVmXGC/4pwzlg0W6jhXQA/giPI4v0BouKFi5S8GwKiSzljre/xdNuX1MEpm48xT6HmyZkPbWBwNOaOtXYIb3gSyzpoocVoZGFtxFjns2uSUtI1YV/f0mbU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T7Y5RiXN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T7Y5RiXN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E9D8C113CC; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:08:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714295340; bh=2tP4WEZOMkIS1sLkWlghhXO5TyWe82hph+C/8aOfuWw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=T7Y5RiXNdk2af9yVhMFgN0/9t8Ya5JILUoNzmuTeGqJEcOhC/3ROemVdt08eAAiOd kQQC0R3+OpOmJRauom0KPVXVC4FFyaUy89IClXA8NA1sZTM95kpee/tkV9jb64Y63k mYABO5C0gAg9O7gFHpmGC8Z5W/NVBR5i2TiqFPA1OlhA4d2RC2cgmXjsZx2pwJwE7d TajWZ0o+VX54bspL0D9ik39WZnf2579ruacTVyk53sL0WKajc5b4Z9ACHvvRo9Go9z 0duLopJ0cIxlpKveXfedpgmgKoX0NaB2PQx5fxvjtcLkicidIy2s5Ix+On69DT6p2e fuqiHkqGxpVHQ== Message-ID: <9c56bbe5-6f33-4e67-82bf-01978b0e2519@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:08:56 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address To: Daeho Jeong Cc: Juhyung Park , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20240409203411.1885121-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20240409203411.1885121-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <050a93dc-d9a8-44bd-9a83-83718e95f04d@kernel.org> <49a4cc15-299f-432c-85c7-ab1b1daaaad1@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/4/28 9:23, Daeho Jeong wrote: > I have a question. Is it okay for META_GENERIC? It seems all users of META_GENERIC comes from IO paths: a) f2fs_merge_page_bio b) f2fs_submit_page_bio c) f2fs_submit_page_write - verify_fio_blkaddr They are all impossible cases? so it's fine to record the error for this case? Thanks,