From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC35C7EE25 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 19:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229675AbjFITGh (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2023 15:06:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229520AbjFITGd (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2023 15:06:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD60C3592 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 12:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51458187be1so3651680a12.2 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:06:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; t=1686337591; x=1688929591; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=4+ONXQdK4a1fSmqiExKhyWkPlcAP+HPrxGCh1eVdlew=; b=cVW5FwqKdsiNy0NAGkMdO7aRrUU+kamUFGT0NxsE7zEB9un9xkK8rTE9IQ0zvAil90 j39g/w3gG+hesvKwGpCwJHYZIgzoQeK/dxjca5UR7k4Qagr0gJL37i7lWFKVHX7s0qZt +iU1hifj8CdPgFlPauUDbnJMP5HGMSPDEf2ts= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686337591; x=1688929591; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4+ONXQdK4a1fSmqiExKhyWkPlcAP+HPrxGCh1eVdlew=; b=UbJJg4ifmXhBPV6kImsbOa7uV4JPNwJg+CRPLCT77PP43ZaE7vqGMFRCJYhpWUqWVJ ORATMkoA05EXon/mB09NrfZyowQeO/2JG9Oc147od4BqPG0BMl5GcaElyCF11BKu/c+u zrfqo80GZ0/trrcLWyi0nx9rsQLkBpcAF2GW5Dnv+pXbwXsTlWMSi050GhuqMdvTemi7 etFVauVk35yZCDtXnr3CkqRfx+KLBiixQvTKt9xlTxcv66aIea+eoZtjXDsuU4Fr6Y60 xkpLA9d6I8a/dJ/JjwZDgireH0UrL6q0g7vwa0rPFFdGmU5PZhoCDYwDD6Se2GqcNKS1 cYwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDz4qiWlq+LK+aRsaO9AQMOWtLW6ssDeq2gSYuthkDliUF39inFr eJUqQC85ZedQruVOkeZWPTf9jDxygNAzQzrHXWbB/RYy X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ48pQt7omxk90Rrr4w6mEx77fjUGN0JqERVc7JH7Qn2dL4w55BuRpHsTfv/v1c+Ylxk7GmmfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d91:b0:97a:bd0f:ac74 with SMTP id gt17-20020a1709072d9100b0097abd0fac74mr1754818ejc.26.1686337591216; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (mail-ed1-f52.google.com. [209.85.208.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cb14-20020a170906a44e00b00977da0f14ffsm1645805ejb.171.2023.06.09.12.06.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5169f614977so3643306a12.3 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:06:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:26c1:b0:978:930e:2279 with SMTP id bp1-20020a17090726c100b00978930e2279mr2489992ejc.52.1686337589586; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:06:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230607200903.652580797@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 12:06:12 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/159] 5.15.116-rc1 review To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, Thomas Gleixner , Ido Schimmel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 11:42=E2=80=AFAM Guenter Roeck = wrote: > > I managed to revise my bisect script sufficiently enough to get reliable > results. It looks like the culprit is commit 503e554782c9 (" debugobject: > Ensure pool refill (again)"); see bisect log below. Bisect on four > different systems all have the same result. After reverting this patch, > I do not see the problem anymore (again, confirmed on four different > systems). Does this happen on mainline too? It's commit 0af462f19e63 in the upstream = tree. It was in 6.4-rc1, and I see a clean result from you at least for -rc2, so for some reason it sounds like upstream is ok. But I don't really see why that would be the case... Linus